1) Hillary Clinton supports a path to citizenship for persons here illegally. What can you expect from an individual that broke federal law using a private email server.
The debate over whether or not Secretary Clinton broke the law as Secretary of State is not unimportant, but it has nothing to do with the merits or the lack thereof concerning her immigration policy.
2) Donald Trump wants to build a wall across America's southern border and make Mexico pay for it. This is not a surprise from someone who cheated repeatedly on his previous wives.
Again, Trump's fidelity or the lack thereof is not insignificant, but what does it have to do with his views on what to do about illegal immigration? His character issues in reference to his previous marriages should not deflect from the pros and cons of the argument.
The next logical fallacy: the genetic fallacy