A Weblog Dedicated to the Discussion of the Christian Faith and 21st Century Life

A Weblog Dedicated to the Discussion of the Christian Faith and 21st Century Life

This blog is a place for the discussion of all things significant and not so important as well. If you read something you disagree with, don't get angry; post a comment and join the discussion.

Passionate and lively debate is encouraged in the context of civility. Comments that include name calling and profanity will be deleted.

Monday, February 28, 2011

Two Personally Difficult Challenges for Pastors

I have been in pastoral ministry for twenty-six years. I love what I do. I am one of those persons who awakens in the morning ready to go after the day with all of its responsibilities and possibilities. I do not count the years to retirement nor have I ever regretted the vocation to which I have been called.

Having said that, I also need to say that pastoral ministry can be difficult. Every pastor knows ministry has its challenges, and pastors and their families need to make sure that they do what is necessary to ensure their own spiritual and physical and emotional well being.

When I was in seminary I remember my teacher Stanley Hauerwas saying that the two most important challenges pastors face are loneliness and self-hate-- loneliness because pastors and their families do not feel comfortable, nor do they find themselves able, at times, to develop the kinds of friendships with others that allow them simply to be "themselves." Second, pastors deal with self-hate because too much pastoral ministry is driven by need and there are so many needs, they cannot all be met. So pastors end up hating themselves because at the end of the day there is always someone who still needs pastoral ministry; there is always something that still needs to be done. Pastors can interpret such unfinished business as neglect and dereliction of their duty, and to make matters worse, parishioners can interpret such unfinished business in the same way.

De-Frag Your Congregation

From Burton Dasset at cyber-coenobites
(Click on the images to enlarge)

Worship not warming up so quickly in the mornings? General sense of apathy? Nasty grinding noises at the congregational meetings? Things over-heating? Maybe things are getting a bit fragged-up. It's time to De-frag your Congregation™ .


This is a newly-formatted congregation. The loyal worshippers are up the front to hear the preacher, packed in closely to show their spiritual unity.


As members join and leave, the congregation becomes more fragmented. Empty seats start to appear, where worshippers used to sit but no longer do.


Some "bad sectors" can form, while other types of worshipper can appear and start to interfere with the smooth operation of your congregation. Things are becoming increasingly fragmented.The performance of the worship group starts to degrade.


 
This is when you need to De-frag your Congregation™. De-frag your Congregation™ goes through the fellowship, re-arranging it into a more efficient format. The Bad Sectors are grouped out of the way (ideally making the coffee), where they can't do any more harm . Worship is once again efficient - and you'll be glad you used De-frag your Congregation™


Sunday, February 27, 2011

Ard Lewis on Interpreting Genesis

A Prayer for the Eighth Sunday after the Epiphany

Lord of light and love, let us not be afraid of you. Come among us and enter into each life: shine your light, revealing things that are crooked or corrupt, forgive all that is sullen or rebellious, dismiss our guilt and inertia, re-awaken each gift and virtue, stir up our neglected ideals, and rekindle our passion for loving and serving you with the delight and liberty of those who know they are redeemed. For your love’s sake. Amen!

--Bruce Prewer

Saturday, February 26, 2011

Internet Wanderings

Some places I have roamed on the Internet Highway:

Another colleague of mine at Ashland Theological Seminary has jumped into the blogosphere! Check out Donna Thomas' blog, Community Gifts.

A video lecture on Paul, Adam, and evolution.

Is the Rapture an invention?

A good review of the Bible and sex.

Michelle Obama, ribs, and black women's bodies.

Our lives speak.

Does the comfort of conformity ease thoughts of death?

The folly of answering fools-- Yep...

Vinyl records are making a comeback!

Is Wisconsin a glimspe of things to come for the rest of us?

Is America an empire?

The Methodist Blogs Weekly Links of Note

This week's five noteworthy posts from the Methoblogosphere:

Angela Shier-Jones: Six Degrees of Separation

Andrew Thompson: What's a Fax Machine?

Christopher Gudger-Raines: BOOM: Offering Myself Without Reserve


Bishop Timothy Whitaker: Life in the Body

Friday, February 25, 2011

Is Exile Necessary for Scriptural Holiness?

One of my favorite Methobloggers, John Meunier, wrote a wonderful post a couple of days ago entitled, "I want to be a Methodist." Among other things he writes,

What troubles me about Kisker’s book [Mainline or Methodist?] is the same thing that troubles me when I read Wesley. To really stand where Wesley stood and do as he did, I do not see how the United Methodist Church could survive such a revival.

To preach holiness, sanctification, justification by faith, and new birth would empty our sanctuaries even more quickly than the grim reaper has been doing for 50 years.

To treat the General Rules like an actual rule of life would melt the phone lines between the homes of the congregation and the bishop’s office.

To act as if the gospel is not something we have to slip into people’s bags while they are not looking – so they take it home along with the stuff they actually came for – would offend.

I do not know how the institutional church could possibly take as its mission the original mission of the Methodist movement. Spreading scriptural holiness is much too demanding, and it is too easy to tell when we fail.
It is not surprising that John's spot on post has received much attention. But let me state that I am highly doubtful that United Methodism in its current shape, form, and worldview can capture its vitality once again as a rivival movement. It is true that Wesley's scriptural holiness is too demanding for our current bourgeois state as Mainline Methodists, but it is too demanding not only because we want and think we can actually have discipleship as easily as microwave instant mashed potatoes, but also because we have embraced a worldview that in no uncertain terms has fallen in love with the spirit of the age.

Scholarship, Social Media, and Publishing: The Times, They are a-Changin

By Jennifer Howard, The Chronicle of Higher Education:
___
Social media have become serious academic tools for many scholars, who use them for collaborative writing, conferencing, sharing images, and other research-related activities. So says a study just posted online called "Social Media and Research Workflow." Among its findings: Social scientists are now more likely to use social-media tools in their research than are their counterparts in the biological sciences. And researchers prefer popular applications like Twitter to those made for academic users.

An online questionnaire went to researchers and editors as well as publishers, administrators, and librarians on cross-disciplinary e-mail lists maintained by five participating publishers—Cambridge University Press; Emerald; Kluwer; Taylor & Francis; and Wiley. Responses came from 2,414 researchers in 215 countries and "every discipline under the sun," according to David Nicholas, one of the lead researchers on the study. He directs the department of information studies at University College London.

The questionnaire focused on eight categories of social-media use: in collaborative writing (e.g., via Google Docs); conferencing; online-scheduling and -meeting arrangements; social networking (Facebook, etc.); image- or video-sharing (e.g., via Flickr and YouTube); blogging; microblogging (Twitter, for instance); and social tagging and bookmarking.

 The survey "showed that social scientists and humanists were the biggest users of social media," said Mr. Nicholas. "These people have lived in a sort of second-rate system in which information was disseminated very slowly. Thanks to social media—Facebook and all the rest of it—they're finding they can operate at the same speed as scientists."

Eighty-four percent of social scientists who took part in the survey reported using social-media tools in their research; the figure for arts and humanities was 79.2 percent, for the biological sciences, 78.3 percent; and for the health sciences, 74.8 percent.

Mr. Nicholas said popular social-media tools such as Skype and Twitter had gotten more traction with researchers than had subject-based tools aimed at specific disciplines or communities of researchers.

"They're easy, they're off the shelf, no problem in using them," he said. Researchers "would much rather use those than specialized brands."

Caption Contest 2011.3... And the Winner Is...

Bruce: "Donuts Anonymous" meeting

Thursday, February 24, 2011

Truth Is Stranger Than Fiction 2011.4: Hey, Doc... My Head Feels Like Someone Stuck a Knife in It

Doctors remove knife from man's head after 4 years
Gillian Wong

From Associated Press
February 18, 2011 7:52 AM EST
___
BEIJING (AP) — Surgeons in southern China successfully removed a rusty, 4-inch (10-centimeter) knife from the skull of a man who said it had been stuck in there for four years, the hospital said Friday.

Li Fuyan, 30, had been suffering from severe headaches, bad breath and breathing difficulties but never knew the cause of his discomfort, said the senior official at the Yuxi City People's Hospital in Yunnan Province.

Li told doctors he had been stabbed in the lower right jaw by a robber four years ago and the blade broke off inside his head without anyone realizing it, said the director of the hospital's Communist Party committee's office who would only give his surname, He.

Surgeons worked cautiously to remove the badly-corroded blade without shattering it, He said. The hospital's website also reported the successful surgery.

The case, which one of the doctors described as a "miracle," has been widely covered by the Chinese media and discussed on the Internet.

Politics As Apocalypse: Wingnuts to the Right of Me and... Yes... Wingnuts to the Left

From John Avlon at The Daily Beast:
___
The Wisconsin protests are proving that the era of unhinged politics is not over. If anything, the hyperpartisan hysteria seems to be catching, with Democratic lawmakers in Indiana running for the hills while a new round of union protests swamps the statehouse in Ohio.

It’s an unwelcome recurrence of politics being treated as apocalypse. Neither side is innocent, but on matters of both style and substance, the left is coming out of this debate looking worse.

We’ve certainly seen a full range of left-wing-nuttery at the protests, from the obligatory Nazi/Hitler comparisons on signs to Democratic elected officials getting into the overheated action. Rep. Michael Capuano (D-MA) declared his solidarity with the mob, saying “every once in a while you need to get out on the streets and get a little bloody when necessary,” while the esteemed Rep. John Lewis (D-GA) said, “There is an unbelievable parallel and a real connection that I can readily identify with the people in the streets of Cairo and Madison, Wisconsin.” Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN) just cut to the chase and called Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker a “dictator.”

To top off the ugliness, there has been a mini-Twitter rampage of kindly folks calling for Walker’s death. They’ve forgotten about Gabby Giffords pretty fast, and the outrage should be more widespread than it’s been to date. But too often, situational ethics is the operative mode in politics, causing partisans to excuse the inexcusable as long as it comes from their side. The attitude seems to be “they may be crazy, but they’re our crazies.”
___
You can read John Avalon's entire post, "Wisconsin Protests: Rise of the Left Wingnuts," here.

Wednesday, February 23, 2011

What To Do With the Civil War?

When he was younger, our one son, Joshua, liked collecting flags. When we would go on vacation he would always use some of his souvenir spending money to buy small flags of the states we visited.

On one occasion we were visiting Monitcello, the plantation of Thomas Jefferson. At the end of our tour we were in the gift shop. Joshua approached me with a small Confederate flag in his hand asking me if he could buy it. Inside myself, I recoiled. It was an interesting first response on my part since I had never really thought about the issues generated by the Confederate flag before. In my gut I knew I could not let him casually purchase the flag with no consideration of its history, which for many, is not romantic nor sentimental. I told him he could not buy it and that I would explain the reason later. That "later," which comprised a two-fold discussion over the Confederate flag and Thomas Jefferson the slaveholder, led to a wonderful discussion with our four children on slavery and an era of American history that only can be romanticized by those of us whose ancestors weren't dragged to a new world away from our homeland.

For the next four years we have entered into the 150th anniversary of the Civil War. In USA Today David Person deals with the very appropriate question that will face all of us over these next months:
To be black and live in the South means making some concessions. You stop getting worked up over every Confederate battle flag car tag you see because if you don't, you'll only give yourself an ulcer. You also learn to accept that all history should be recognized and deserves some commemoration.

But after 30 years of living here as I have, you also realize that there is a big difference between commemoration — and celebration. This difference — and its impact — is often ignored or dismissed by some of my fellow Southerners. Not even 150 years can erase that fact.

Tuesday, February 22, 2011

When It Comes to the Big Issues of Our Day, Christians Demonstrate Their Irrelevance

Once again nation state politics, this time in Wisconsin, has demonstrated that many Christians find their identity as Democrats and Republicans, as progressives and conservatives, more significant than their identification as people who are "in Christ." I have watched and listened to Christians on the left and on the right these past few days chime in on the situation in Wisconsin and I simply cannot distinguish the position of either side from any old atheist. On the left, there are Christians who are unashamedly supporting public unions ("public" is a misnomer; they are state unions) posting pictures of fists and shouting solidarity. On the right, Christians are supporting Governor Scott Walker and encouraging contra-protests in favor of the Governor and against the state unions, bringing in the Tea Party to balance out the shouting and anger, making the shouting and the anger that much louder.

But in the midst of all of this what seems to be missing is an alternative witness, a Christian voice that reminds people on both sides of the need for reconciliation... on the necessity of compromise on both sides, of emphasizing the selfish sickness that infects all human souls that has created the fiscal mess in which we find ourselves-- a mess that all of us have contributed to-- Republicans and Democrats, politicians and business folk, state and private labor unions and corporate management, and the everyday common Joe and Jane. What is missing are the searing, soul-searching questions that Christians should be good at asking of all interests involved. What is missing is a reminder to everyone that when we point a finger at someone else, three are pointing back at us. What is missing is the denunciation of protest signs with pictures of Hitler and a portrait of Governor Walker in cross hairs (definitive proof that both sides engage in incendiary demagoguery). What is missing is the condemnation of unsavory forces (on both sides) trying to dig up dirt on the main players on the other side in order to undermine their position. What is missing-- what we are left with instead-- are Christians who have chosen up sides demonizing the other side and posting Facebook statuses asking others to post the same status if they support workers' rights or-- on the other side--the endeavor of the state government's attempt at fiscal responsibility-- both sides reflecting a not-so-prophetic attempt at prophetic social media-- a kind of not-so-serious silliness that Amos and Hosea would find baffling.

What is missing in the midst of all the hoopla is a Christian witness that may offer a different way from what we are witnessing. What is missing is a reminder to all sides that only through sacrifice can reconciliation actually be achieved.

Why is this third way missing? Because when it comes to the big issues of our day, Christians have once again demonstrated that left and right, conservative and liberal, Democrat and Republican are more definitive for their identity than being in Christ,

When in comes to the big issues of our day, Christians continue to demonstrate their irrelevance.

Monday, February 21, 2011

The Decline of the Blog?

___
SAN FRANCISCO — Like any aspiring filmmaker, Michael McDonald, a high school senior, used a blog to show off his videos. But discouraged by how few people bothered to visit, he instead started posting his clips on Facebook, where his friends were sure to see and comment on his editing skills.

“I don’t use my blog anymore,” said Mr. McDonald, who lives in San Francisco. “All the people I’m trying to reach are on Facebook.”

Blogs were once the outlet of choice for people who wanted to express themselves online. But with the rise of sites like Facebook and Twitter, they are losing their allure for many people — particularly the younger generation.

The Internet and American Life Project at the Pew Research Center found that from 2006 to 2009, blogging among children ages 12 to 17 fell by half; now 14 percent of children those ages who use the Internet have blogs. Among 18-to-33-year-olds, the project said in a report last year, blogging dropped two percentage points in 2010 from two years earlier.

Blogs went largely unchallenged until Facebook reshaped consumer behavior with its all-purpose hub for posting everything social. Twitter, which allows messages of no longer than 140 characters, also contributed to the upheaval.

Former bloggers said they were too busy to write lengthy posts and were uninspired by a lack of readers. Others said they had no interest in creating a blog because social networking did a good enough job keeping them in touch with friends and family.

Caption Contest 2011.3

Sunday, February 20, 2011

Pastors... Here Is Wisdom You Dare Not Neglect!

Ken Carter offers wise words that I need to hear:
___
I have seen some of the research about clergy well-being, and some of it related to vacation: many clergy do not take all of their vacation days, and those who seem to be healthy are able to get some distance from the work. We most often get away in the summer, but for some reason we have been able to take some time away this year in the dead of winter, and I can only say that I recommend it. It began with the preaching schedule, that allowed me to be away on a Sunday. My colleague would be preaching, the Scouts (Boy and Girl) would be assisting in the liturgy, and so that worked out. I asked a friend, who is preparing for ordination, to visit on a couple of my hospital days, and that also helped with the visitation load. I communicated all of this with two chairs of committees, whose meetings I would be missing. I promised that I would catch up with them when I returned.

December had been hectic. Advent had been full. End of year giving was a stretch. Christmas eve was a marathon. Then a good friend called on the day after Christmas: her husband was in the process of dying, her son was in from out of town. I went over, and we visited and planned the service, which fell on the New Year's holiday. Then Epiphany. Then guests from Haiti joined us for a few days, and the missionary Jim Gulley was with us, his sermon live streamed across the world via Rethink Church. Then the administrative work leading to the approval of the budget, which, thanks be to God, was better than I could have imagined.

So a week emerged, an opening. Miraculously, it was there in my wife's schedule. Since she is heavily involved in mission work in Haiti, this is not always a given. And so we spent a period of eight days away from Charlotte, three in the mountains of western North Carolina, and five in New Orleans.
___
Don't stop reading now! Check out the rest of Ken's post, "Vacation," here.

A Prayer for the Seventh Sunday after Epiphany

God most holy, God most loving, God most faithful; teach us to fear you without being afraid, to serve you without being slavish, to worship you without being flattering. For you are indeed holy: You are perfect in grace, perfect in mercy, and perfect in truth. Without you there are only shadows and broken images. With you there is always light and life and holy joy. Wonderful is your name today and for ever! Through Christ Jesus our Redeemer, Amen!

--Bruce Prewer

Saturday, February 19, 2011

Is the Christian Divorce Rate as High as Many Have Said?

What do you make of this?

From Glenn T. Stanton, Baptist Press
___
COLORADO SPRINGS, Colo. (BP)--"Christians divorce at roughly the same rate as the world!" It's one of the most quoted stats by Christian leaders today. And it's perhaps one of the most inaccurate.

Based on the best data available, the divorce rate among Christians is significantly lower than the general population.

Here's the truth....

Many people who seriously practice a traditional religious faith -- be it Christian or other -- have a divorce rate markedly lower than the general population.

The factor making the most difference is religious commitment and practice. Couples who regularly practice any combination of serious religious behaviors and attitudes -- attend church nearly every week, read their Bibles and spiritual materials regularly; pray privately and together; generally take their faith seriously, living not as perfect disciples, but serious disciples -- enjoy significantly lower divorce rates than mere church members, the general public and unbelievers.

Professor Bradley Wright, a sociologist at the University of Connecticut, explains from his analysis of people who identify as Christians but rarely attend church, that 60 percent of these have been divorced. Of those who attend church regularly, 38 percent have been divorced [1].

The Methodist Blogs Weekly Links of Note

This week's five noteworthy posts from the Methoblogosphere:
.
Michael Daniel: Inside Out



Friday, February 18, 2011

The Problem with Diversity for Diversity's Sake

What do you think of this?

From Michael Jones at The Boston Globe:
___
It has become increasingly popular to speak of racial and ethnic diversity as a civic strength. From multicultural festivals to pronouncements from political leaders, the message is the same: our differences make us stronger.

But a massive new study, based on detailed interviews of nearly 30,000 people across America, has concluded just the opposite. Harvard political scientist Robert Putnam -- famous for "Bowling Alone," his 2000 book on declining civic engagement -- has found that the greater the diversity in a community, the fewer people vote and the less they volunteer, the less they give to charity and work on community projects. In the most diverse communities, neighbors trust one another about half as much as they do in the most homogenous settings. The study, the largest ever on civic engagement in America, found that virtually all measures of civic health are lower in more diverse settings.

"The extent of the effect is shocking," says Scott Page, a University of Michigan political scientist.

The study comes at a time when the future of the American melting pot is the focus of intense political debate, from immigration to race-based admissions to schools, and it poses challenges to advocates on all sides of the issues. The study is already being cited by some conservatives as proof of the harm large-scale immigration causes to the nation's social fabric. But with demographic trends already pushing the nation inexorably toward greater diversity, the real question may yet lie ahead: how to handle the unsettling social changes that Putnam's research predicts.

"We can't ignore the findings," says Ali Noorani, executive director of the Massachusetts Immigrant and Refugee Advocacy Coalition. "The big question we have to ask ourselves is, what do we do about it; what are the next steps?"


The study is part of a fascinating new portrait of diversity emerging from recent scholarship. Diversity, it shows, makes us uncomfortable -- but discomfort, it turns out, isn't always a bad thing. Unease with differences helps explain why teams of engineers from different cultures may be ideally suited to solve a vexing problem. Culture clashes can produce a dynamic give-and-take, generating a solution that may have eluded a group of people with more similar backgrounds and approaches. At the same time, though, Putnam's work adds to a growing body of research indicating that more diverse populations seem to extend themselves less on behalf of collective needs and goals.


Does Religion Lose It's Grip Where Life is Good?

Phil Zuckerman, a professor of sociology and an atheist, offers some advice to his fellow atheists in The Huffington Post entitled, "The Top Mistakes Atheists Make." It is a very interesting read. I certainly agree with much of his critique of his "God-denying brothers and sisters." Since I am not an atheist I disagree with several of the details of his critique. But what caught my attention was what he wrote in reference to mistake #6:
Focusing on arguments against the existence of God, rather than working to make the world a better, more just place. People who believe in irrational things will rarely change their minds by listening to rational arguments. And yet atheists expel so much sweat constructing philosophical, scientific, or logical arguments against the existence of God. Think this will change people's minds? Perhaps. But only rarely. What really lowers levels of religiosity, the world-over, is living in a society where life is decent and secure. When people have enough to eat, shelter, healthcare, elder-care, child-care, employment, peacefulness, democracy -- that's when religion really starts to lose its grip.
Let me narrow that quotation to the subject of my concern:
What really lowers levels of religiosity, the world-over, is living in a society where life is decent and secure. When people have enough to eat, shelter, healthcare, elder-care, child-care, employment, peacefulness, democracy -- that's when religion really starts to lose its grip.
Does Zuckerman have a point that we religious folk need to ponder? The secularization of Western Europe and the quickly encroaching secularization of Canada and the United States appear to confirm his point. In contrast, it appears that Christianity is spreading quickly in places that cannot be described as prosperous.

Wednesday, February 16, 2011

What Is the Kingdom of God?

From Scot McKnight:
For some the “kingdom” is the social stuff, the be-good-to-others stuff, the justice stuff while “salvation” is the spiritual and conversion stuff. Another way I hear folks talk about this is this: kingdom is social stuff, it is universal stuff, it is the stuff we do to make the world a better place — in this sense, kingdom is much bigger than the church.

...many of us see “kingdom” as the “personal experience of God’s reign.” In other words, we find in the term “kingdom” our evangelical theology of the need for personal conversion. For such folks, kingdom is little different than the personal experience of salvation. This comes at the term from a modern evangelical angle and almost completely misses the Jewish context. This view of kingdom is hurting the church as much as it is helping because it feeds our individualism.

...while I can see some conversional dimensions to kingdom in the NT in the “enter the kingdom” sayings, we simply must begin where Jews would have begun: in the Jewish world, the very first connection with the word “kingdom” is “David.” God established the kingdom of David, God cut in half the kingdom of David, God disciplined the kingdom of Israel/Judah, and God promised someday the kingdom of our father David would be restored. When Jesus said, “the kingdom is at hand” in Mark 1:15, the ordinary Jew didn’t say “Wow, I can now get saved” but “Finally, our promises for the Davidic kingdom will be realized.” We must begin here or we get it all wrong.

Tuesday, February 15, 2011

Does Your Church Suffer from Program-itis?


Program-itis is a made-up word that I use to describe a condition that diminishes the church and inhibits its mission. It is the dependence upon programs that are produced by denominational publishing houses, para-church organizations, and mega-churches. These programs promise pastors and Christian educators that they will help their congregations to be on the “cutting edge” of cultural relevance, attract new members, and increase participation in church ministries. Over the past 50 years church leaders have been well trained to look for, purchase, and use the latest programs if they want to be effective and grow their churches.

We United Methodists are very good at producing and consuming excellent programs. They all have characteristics in common: they must be purchased, leaders must be recruited and trained, a limited duration (a few days, four weeks, six weeks, eight weeks, thirty-four weeks), they are designed, written, and produced outside the context of the local congregation, and they lead users to purchase the next, “sequel”, program.

Don’t get me wrong. I am not saying there is anything wrong with programs or that congregations should stop using them. I believe they can have an important role in congregational life and mission when they are part of an intentional curriculum of Christian initiation, education and formation. Therein lays the problem.

The problem, as I see it, is that programs have replaced basic practices of Christian formation. Congregations are caught up in what Jacque Ellul calls the “device paradigm” that is always looking for, and counting on, the “quick fix.” If you watch television at all you can see this played out every day. Marketers send the message in advertisements that if we purchase their car, soft drink, drug, laundry detergent, computer, or any other of a multitude of products then our problems will be solved and we will be happy and fulfilled. The culture trains us to believe that we must look outside of ourselves to find the right “device” or technology to meet our needs and to make us whole. We are told over and over and over again that we do not posses within ourselves the means to become fully human. This is the lie of the “device paradigm” that fosters our dependence upon techniques and technology and the quick fix. Congregations are not immune to this. This is why we have succumbed to the device paradigm and now suffer from “programitis.” We need to realize that, while programs have a role to play, we have become far too dependent upon them to do the work of Christian formation.

You can read Steve's entire post, "Program-itis," here.

I Couldn't Be an Atheist

So says Sir Anthony Hopkins in an interview with the Catholic Herald:

Sir Anthony Hopkins told the Catholic Herald this week that he "couldn't live with" the certainty of being an atheist.

The actor, who was knighted in 1993, said: "Being an atheist must be like living in a closed cell with no windows".

Sir Anthony said: "I'd hate to live like that, wouldn't you? We see them, mind you, on television today, many brilliant people who are professional atheists who say they know for a fact that it's insanity to have a God or to believe in religion. Well, OK, God bless them for feeling that way and I hope they're happy."

He added: "But I couldn't live with that certainty, and I wonder about some of them: why are they protesting so much? How are they so sure of what is out there? And who am I to refute the beliefs of so many great philosophers and martyrs all the way down the years?"

Sir Anthony, who is most famous for playing the cannibal Hannibal Lecter in The Silence of the Lambs, stars as Fr Lucas in The Rite, based on the experiences of American exorcist Fr Gary Thomas.

Monday, February 14, 2011

Is Facebook Killing the Church?

Richard Beck, a prof at ACU, writes,

So why has mobile social computing affected church attendance? Well, if church has always been kind of lame and irritating why did people go in the first place? Easy, social relationships. Church has always been about social affiliation. You met your friends, discussed your week, talked football, shared information about good schools, talked local politics, got the scoop, and made social plans (“Let’s get together for dinner this week!”). Even if you hated church you could feel lonely without it. Particularly with the loss of “third places” in America.

But Millennials are in a different social situation. They don’t need physical locations for social affiliation. They can make dinner plans via text, cell phone call or Facebook. In short, the thing that kept young people going to church, despite their irritations, has been effectively replaced. You don’t need to go to church to stay connected or in touch. You have an iPhone.

Sure, Millennials will report that the “reason” they are leaving the church is due to its perceived hypocrisy or shallowness. My argument is that while this might be the proximate cause the more distal cause is social computing. Already connected Millennials have the luxury to kick the church to the curb. This is the position of strength that other generations did not have. We fussed about the church but, at the end of the day, you went to stay connected. For us, church was Facebook!

The pushback here will be that all this Millennial social computing, all this Facebooking, isn’t real, authentic relationship. I’d disagree with that assessment. It goes to the point I made earlier: Most of our Facebook interactions are with people we know, love, and are in daily contact with. Facebook isn’t replacing “real” relationships with “virtual” relationships. It’s simply connecting us to our real friends. And if you can do this without getting up early on Sunday morning why go to church? Particularly if the church is hypocritical and shallow? Why mess with it?

Why are Millennials leaving the church? It's simple. Mobile social computing has replaced the main draw of the traditional church: Social connection and affiliation.

Basically, Facebook killed the church. May it Rest in Peace.
___
You can read the entire post, "How Facebook Killed the Church," here.

Sunday, February 13, 2011

Is "Fundamentalist" a Term for All Things Evil?


Labels are such tricky things, and any linguist is aware of the problems of saying that a word should mean some certain thing. So I’m going to resist that. But it would be nice to have a label for people who were very firm about the tenets of their faith, and yet was not also a pejorative term.

More and more, “fundamentalist” is used in a pejorative sense. You can be an evangelical Christian, and you might be considered a reasonable person. A little over pious, perhaps, but reasonable. But fundamentalist now carries the connotation of Westboro Baptist protesting at funerals, suicide bombers, and planes flying into buildings. Most fundamentalists I know, whether Christian or Muslim, don’t think the actions of those groups. You even have the term “fundamentalist atheist” for atheists who are firm in expressing their beliefs and don’t give in to anyone else.

On one online forum in which I participated, the common standard was to use “fundamentalist” of the person’s basic beliefs, but to call someone who was also over the line in terms of behavior a “fundy.” It didn’t always work. In fact, it rarely worked, because a pejorative label is unlikely to be received well by anyone.

A Prayer for the Sixth Sunday after Epiphany

O God, the strength of all who put their trust in you: Mercifully accept our prayers; and because in our weakness we can do nothing good without you, give us the help of your grace, that in keeping your commandments we may please you both in will and deed; through Jesus Christ our Lord, who lives and reigns with you and the Holy Spirit, one God, for ever and ever. Amen.

Saturday, February 12, 2011

Breathing New Life into Worship


I was sharing with my friend Adam Hamilton not long ago that contemporary worship has become boring for me. Those of us influenced by the Jesus' movement of the 60’s and 70’s pioneered early models of contemporary liturgies, which began in the informal gatherings of believers meeting together on college campuses, apartments and coffee houses, along with the influences of Christian rock and Jesus music festivals. The fresh new forms of relevant music, participatory sharing and free flowing spontaneous prayer created a welcoming space for our friends who had no connection to the ancient forms of traditional worship and for those of us who were just plain bored by tired repetitive traditional liturgies that had no connection to daily life. As many of us began to find our way back into the traditional church, we brought our guitars and new contemporary styles with us. I participated in some powerful guitar masses in Cincinnati in the early 1970’s. Contemporary worship forms were bringing Christians together from many different traditions. The Catholic and Protestant Charismatic renewals brought Catholics and Protestants together in conferences and worship experiences with the promising hope of a new horizon for Christian unity. The movement peaked in the 70’s and began to decline, somewhat due to emotional and theological excesses, in the 80’s. The contemporary movement became more distinctly evangelical protestant, connected to the church growth-seeker model in the 80’s. Drama, media and other artistic forms were also introduced during the next decade. Mainline churches began to experiment with the addition of contemporary worship services while maintaining traditional worship options.

So what are my issues with contemporary worship, which is a form that I have advocated and helped pioneer? 

Friday, February 11, 2011

Truth Is Stranger Than Fiction 2011.3: Confession-- There's an App for That!

New iPhone, iPad app helps you keep track of sins

From Associated Press
February 09, 2011 10:25 PM EST

SOUTH BEND, Indiana (AP) — Can your iPad or iPhone bring you closer to God? A new application for the devices aims to help Roman Catholics who haven't been to the confessional booth in a while keep track of their sins, one Commandment at a time.

The $1.99 "Confession: A Roman Catholic App" can't grant forgiveness — you still need to receive the sacrament from a real, live priest like always. The app's designers and some believers see it as a way to spur Catholics back into the habit of repenting.

"There's a reason we designed it for these mobile devices: We want you to go to confession," said Patrick Leinen, one of the developers and a co-founder of the company Little iApps.

Over the last several decades, American Catholics have been receiving the penitential sacrament less frequently, and many of them may not know how it's done.

"As somebody who's heard thousands of confessions, there are some people who get so scared coming in that they lose their train of thought and they're not able to remember everything they planned to say," said the Rev. Dan Scheidt, pastor of Queen of Peace Catholic Church in Mishawaka, who advised the developers.

The text-based app takes the user through the Ten Commandments, with a slew of questions attached to each, a process known as an examination of conscience, which penitents undergo before confession.

Questions range from "Have I wished evil upon another person?" to "Have I used any method of contraception or artificial birth control in my marriage?" and users can check a box next to each sin they've committed.

Thursday, February 10, 2011

Science and Faith Are Compatible

Get a cup of coffee and enjoy listening to a great thinker!

United Methodists Have No Identity... And This Is a Surprise?

John Meunier quotes George Hunter:
"The people called United Methodists cannot recall who they are, if indeed most of our present members ever knew," Hunter lamented. "They are no longer rooted in scripture or in any recognizable version of Methodism’s theological vision."
Hunter quipped: "Thousands of our churches are analogous to mules – which are creatures that are so genetically compromised that they are incapable of reproduction." And he warned: "Don't expect much vitality, much less reproduction. There is not much vitality or reproduction anywhere the gospel is in absentia." …

Hunter further regretted about United Methodism: "The religion that inhabits the minds of our attendees is now about as likely to be deism, or pantheism, or middle class moralism, or civil religion, or even astrology or luck, as any recognizable form of the faith once delivered to the saints." He remarked: "What is now called Methodism, in many places, has retained the form of religion but without the power."
Hunter is spot on... a group cannot retain any sense of significant identity when it no longer knows what sets it off from others, when it no longer stands as an alternative. Shallow notions of inclusiveness and sentimental accounts of love and passive understandings of grace and embracing the politics of the DNC are not sufficient for a church to mantain a sense of itself. Indeed, they are counter productive. Moreover, they are woefully inadequate in forming a people that will cohere around a central and deeply profound vision that makes what they are about necessary for others. When a church puts much of its energy and emphasis on being in the good graces of those in the halls of state power, when its people are actually excited that their denomination is well represented in Congress, when its leaders trip over their tongues to get an audience with the President of the United States, they are indeed incapable of producing anything that is vital for God's Kingdom-- and reproduction is not only impossible... frankly... it is not desirable.

For Christians, modern political progressivism is not progress and modern political conservatism is not a guardian of our best traditions. And for Christians to identify themselves by such labels is not only to undermine the politics of God's Kingdom, it is to embrace idolatry. In such a context no wonder doctrine becomes unimportant. When the world of Christendom sets the agenda, doctrine becomes nothing more than matters of personal preference, and morals are founded on the slippery and vacuous rantings of emotivist response and not on Scripture informed by our deepest and most profound traditions. And when the connection between doctrine and ethics is lost the church is left with very little in the way of uniqueness with which to commend itself to those outside the walls of its edifices, which stand as crumbling monuments to its embrace of civil religion and a day now long past. And those who insist that doctrine matters are ridiculed as close-minded snobs as if God cares little about his people's search for truth and much about their living a domesticated ethic which amounts to little more than being nice. The mainline Protestant project sows the seeds of its own demise.

Hunter's words should come as no surprise. But for many United Methodists they will come as quite a shock and will appear by many apologists of the status quo as extreme... and that, in and of itself, demonstrates the truth of his words.

Wednesday, February 09, 2011

The Haircut

With thanks to Richard Hall. I have made some slight editorial changes for our context on this side of the pond:

One day a florist went to a barber for a haircut. After the cut, he asked about his bill, and the barber replied, "I cannot accept money from you, I'm doing community service this week.' The florist was pleased and left the shop. When the barber went to open his shop the next morning, there was a 'thank you' card and a dozen roses waiting for him at his door.

Later, a cop comes in for a haircut, and when he tries to pay his bill, the barber again replied, 'I cannot accept money from you, I'm doing community service this week.' The cop was happy and left the shop. The next morning when the barber went to open up, there was a 'thank you' card and a dozen donuts waiting for him at his door.

Then a Member of Congress came in for a haircut, and when he went to pay his bill, the barber again replied, 'I can not accept money from you. I'm doing community service this week.' The Member of Congress was very happy and left the shop. The next morning, when the barber went to open up, there were a dozen other Members of Congress lined up waiting for a free haircut.

Social Scientist Sees Bias Within

Some of us have known this for a long time.

By John Tierney, New York Times
Published: February 7, 2011

SAN ANTONIO — Some of the world’s pre-eminent experts on bias discovered an unexpected form of it at their annual meeting.

Discrimination is always high on the agenda at the Society for Personality and Social Psychology’s conference, where psychologists discuss their research on racial prejudice, homophobia, sexism, stereotype threat and unconscious bias against minorities. But the most talked-about speech at this year’s meeting, which ended Jan. 30, involved a new “outgroup.”

It was identified by Jonathan Haidt, a social psychologist at the University of Virginia who studies the intuitive foundations of morality and ideology. He polled his audience at the San Antonio Convention Center, starting by asking how many considered themselves politically liberal. A sea of hands appeared, and Dr. Haidt estimated that liberals made up 80 percent of the 1,000 psychologists in the ballroom. When he asked for centrists and libertarians, he spotted fewer than three dozen hands. And then, when he asked for conservatives, he counted a grand total of three.

“This is a statistically impossible lack of diversity,” Dr. Haidt concluded, noting polls showing that 40 percent of Americans are conservative and 20 percent are liberal. In his speech and in an interview, Dr. Haidt argued that social psychologists are a “tribal-moral community” united by “sacred values” that hinder research and damage their credibility — and blind them to the hostile climate they’ve created for non-liberals.

“Anywhere in the world that social psychologists see women or minorities underrepresented by a factor of two or three, our minds jump to discrimination as the explanation,” said Dr. Haidt, who called himself a longtime liberal turned centrist. “But when we find out that conservatives are underrepresented among us by a factor of more than 100, suddenly everyone finds it quite easy to generate alternate explanations.”

Monday, February 07, 2011

Catherine of Siena: Doctor of the Church

from Caroline T. Marshall:

Catherine of Siena lived her remarkable Christian life during the chaos and violence of the fourteenth century. While the medieval order was dying, she labored for peace, reform, and the renewal of the human spirit.

Following Christ’s instruction, Catherine believed it was her duty to reform the church, to evangelize, and to comfort the sick, poor, and condemned. She was an activist in an age when a woman’s religious vocation was supposed to be confined and apart from the world. Warmed by divine love from her intimate experience of God, Catherine proclaimed a personal faith in Jesus Christ that touches contemporary Christians with its conviction and immediacy.

Youthful Devotion

She was born Caterina di Icopo di Benincasa in the spring of 1347. Her home in Tuscany was torn by civil and ecclesiastical conflict. The great Italian city-states, including Catherine’s own Siena, were making an uneasy transition from feudal society and economy to early modern republicanism and commercial capitalism. Catherine and her generation of Italians endured frequent wars and threats of invasion.

Catherine’s birth into a middle-class wool dyer’s family caused scarcely a ripple; she was the twenty-fourth of twenty-five children. While still a small girl, about 7, Catherine was touched by the extraordinary movement of the Holy Spirit in her community and saw a vision of Jesus with Peter, Paul, and John the evangelist. She announced her determination to live some sort of special religious life. Alarmed, her father Jacobo and mother Lupa tried to divert her into the customary preparation for marriage and children. In spite of coercion and punishment, during which she was forced to act as a maid in her parents’ house, she remained steadfast. At age 15 she even cut off her hair to thwart pressures to marry.

Choosing the "Third Way"

The early death of Catherine’s sister Bonaventura, a model young wife, appeared to seal Catherine’s determination to enter a religious vocation where life might seem more than a brief, transitory experience. The great question was, What kind of religious life?

Catherine did not want to be an ordinary nun, either active or contemplative. And the exotic life of the perpetually enclosed anchorite (see “Terms of the Religious Life”) did not appeal to her. Her childhood experiences of religion predicted a mystical approach to the faith. At the same moment, Catherine was an active person, in body as well as mind. Christian service, traditionally offered by religious women to the poor and sick, attracted her.

Her cousin and first confessor, Tommaso della Fonte, was a Dominican priest, and he encouraged her to think in terms of the great mendicant reform orders of St. Francis and St. Dominic. Committed to preaching and service, these begging orders represented the last popular internal reform in the church prior to the Protestant Reformation. In 1363, Catherine joined the Third Order of the Dominicans. Thus, she chose a “third way,” the life of the religious lay woman.

The Third Order provided a satisfying way for lay people to participate in the formal religious life. Catherine could live at home and direct her own activities. She was younger (age 16) than her fellows and rather bossy, but from the first she became an influence and formed her own famiglia, those men and women who found her especially appealing and devout.

Her spiritual family included many old friends, and new people, of whom Bartolomeo Dominici was most important. He joined Catherine in 1368 as her second confessor. Young and brilliant, Bartolomeo encouraged his charge to expand her horizons. During this period, Catherine learned to read. Precisely what she read can only be deduced from her later writings. However, it is clear she read the Bible, especially the Gospels. Her favorite apostolic sources were John and Paul. Of the church fathers, she became familiar with Gregory the Great and Augustine. Her language also reveals that she became deeply familiar with the popular preachers of the day.

Read More...

Sunday, February 06, 2011

A Prayer for the Fifth Sunday after the Epiphany

Father, we thank you for revealing yourself to us in Jesus the Christ, we who once were not your people but whom you chose to adopt as your people. As ancient Israel confessed long ago, we realize that it was not because of our own righteousness, or our own superior wisdom, or strength, or power, or numbers. It was simply because you loved us, and chose to show us that love in Jesus.
.
May we, through your guidance and our faithful obedience, find new avenues in ways that we have not imagined of holding the Light of your love so that it may be a Light of revelation for all people.
.
We thank you for your love, praise you for your Gift, ask for your continued Presence with us, and bring these petitions in the name of your Son, who has truly revealed your heart. Amen.
--Dennis Bratcher

Saturday, February 05, 2011

The Methodist Blogs Weekly Links of Note

NOTE: There will be no MB Weekly Links of Note next Saturday. My schedule next week will take me away from the blogosphere for most of the week, so blog reading and posting will be seriously limited.

This week's five noteworthy posts from the Methoblogosphere:



Dan Dick: Dia-Gnostics


Bishop Timothy Whitaker: Creation Spirituality

Friday, February 04, 2011

The Art of Misspelling

It doesn't look as if anyone will learn English in the Village of Crestwood.
---

Hey, North Carolina! Your tax dollars at work!
---

Someone needs to BUY a Dictionary.
---

Apparently parking quietly is OK.
---

Caption Contest 2011.2... And the Winner Is...

Nancy: "Even though Stuart Little got the idea from seeing an old episode of MacGyver, the plan lost its appeal when he was hanging in the air helpless."

Thursday, February 03, 2011

Should We Evangelize Uncontacted Indigenious Tribes?

Survival International has released photos of an uncontacted indigenous tribe in the jungles of Brazil. Uncontacted means exactly that-- they have had absolutely no direct contact with human beings outside of their own village. They know nothing of TV or the Internet, and only God knows what they believe the airplanes are that they see flying overhead. Experts estimate that worldwide there are over 100 uncontacted indigenous tribes worldwide, most of them reside in Peru and Brazil in the Amazon rainforest.

The indigenous rights group released the photos to call attention to illegal logging that continues to move toward the land of these indigenous peoples. I support Survival International's desire to save the rainforest, not only for its own sake, but also because there is no good argument to be made for destroying these persons' habitat.

But here is my question: should the church send missionaries to these tribes in an attempt to share the Gospel of Jesus Christ with them? This is an issue that should elicit considerable response. So what do you think? If we have the opportunity to send missionaries to them, should we?

All are encouraged to respond and all views are welcome.

Wednesday, February 02, 2011

The Church Has an Edifice Complex

On Reformation Sunday it is common for many Protestant Churches to sing Martin Luther's wonderful hymn, "A Mighty Fortress Is Our God." I post a portion of those words:

A mighty fortress is our God, a bulwark never failing; our helper he amid the flood of mortal ills prevailing. For still our ancient foe doth seek to work us woe; his craft and power are great, and armed with cruel hate, on earth is not his equal.

But I think if we in the Western Church in the 21st century were honest, we would admit that we treat our church buildings more like a mighty fortress than the God in whom we trust in all times and places and circumstance. As one of my seminary professors liked to say, when it comes to the church building itself, most Christians have an edifice complex.

It is not that our church buildings cannot serve to further the mission of Jesus Christ in our communities and the world, but we need to shift the emphasis of our ministry from the brick and mortar structure as the central location and the goal of mission to the starting point of ministry. In other words, the church building should not be the fortress where all the action is, but the outpost that sends disciples out into the community to establish more outposts that may very well take on a different character and focus on a specific ministry.

Tuesday, February 01, 2011

Søren Kiekegaard: Artist in the Image of Jesus

Peter Enns, has an informative and thought-provoking post over at The Biologos Forum blog on Jesus the Artist. Enns writes,
Speaking in parables is indeed similar to an artist's craft. Neither are systematic, logical arguments aimed at intellectual persuasion. Rather, they create impressions, whole new worlds of meaning intended to turn old worlds on their heads. Further, they do not always clarify, but actually can by design obscure a deeper reality. To apprehend that deeper reality, one must-- like a patron facing a timeless painting--continue to seek, ponder, and meditate on what is being said.

Parables are radical pieces of communication meant to disorient the hearers and then reorient them to an entirely new way of thinking. The reason Jesus does so much story telling is because stories-- not debate or other "proofs"-- are best suited for such a whole scale reorientation. Jesus' preaching, after all, was about the kingdom of heaven (or of God). This kingdom was not about where one goes after death, but a here-and-now transformation of how people thought about God and their relationship to him.
As I read Pete's post, one of my favorite thinkers came to mind-- Søren Kierkegaard. Kierkegaard was a sophisticated philosopher and theologian; and he was also a storyteller. Enns writes, "Sometimes the best way to get an idea across is to paint a verbal picture, which is precisely what Jesus does in the parables." And Kierkegaard follows Jesus in like fashion in his writings.