The latest editorial from Peggy Noonan is quite insightful and worth consideration (which doesn't necessarily mean that she is right).A Weblog Dedicated to the Discussion of the Christian Faith and 21st Century Life
Friday, April 30, 2010
Washington DC to the American People: "We Control Everything" and "You're On Your Own"
The latest editorial from Peggy Noonan is quite insightful and worth consideration (which doesn't necessarily mean that she is right).The Methodist Blogs Daily Links-- Friday 4.30.10
Any Methoblogger who would like a link included in the MBDL email your post to me at umweeklyroundup(at)yahoo(dot)com. Your link will be posted within two weekdays. No blog will be listed in the MBDL more than once in a week.Thursday, April 29, 2010
The Methodist Blogs Daily Links-- Thursday 4.29.10
Any Methoblogger who would like a link included in the MBDL, email your post to me at umweeklyroundup(at)yahoo(dot)com. Your link will be posted within two weekdays. No blog will be listed in the MBDL more than once in a week.Wednesday, April 28, 2010
You Don't Get Strung Up on a Cross for Running Around Telling Everyone to Love Each Other
One of the flaws of the most characteristic Liberal portrayal of Jesus was the unlikelihood that anyone would have wanted to crucify such an attractive moral teacher. In recent questing it has been more widely recognized that a test of any hypothesis' viability is whether it provides a satisfactory answer to the question, Why was Jesus crucified?-- James D.G. DunnThe Methodist Blogs Daily Links-- Wednesday 4.28.10
Any Methoblogger who would like a link included in the MBDL, email your post to me at umweeklyroundup(at)yahoo(dot)com. Your link will be posted within two weekdays. No blog will be listed in the MBDL more than once in a week.Today's selection from the Methoblogosphere:
Bishop William H. Willimon writes on Wesley for everyone.
Dale Tedder comments on the loyalty of Ittai.
Michael Daniel reflects on the poisonous well of political incumbancy.
Some thoughts on illegal immigration and the police state from Henry Neufeld.
Spiritual hunger and worship according to Sally Coleman.
Ken Carter writes on how a generation is re-thinking church.
If he died would you attend John Meunier's funeral?
Joseph Slife on Bill Bouknight on the Council of Bishops.
Lorna Koskela is looking back... looking forward.
Ponderments on the color of new life from Deb Spaulding.
"The Bread We Need"-- a story from Questing Parson.
Tuesday, April 27, 2010
Joshua in 3-D: Biblical Conquest and Manifest Destiny #3
This post is the third in a series of five posts by Dr. L. Daniel Hawk, Professor of Old Testament and Hebrew at Ashland Theological Seminary..
Conquest narratives work by establishing and maintaining a stark distinction between the invader “us” and the indigenous “them.” Shaping the indigenous “them” into the opposite of the invader “us” enables the invader to soothe moral qualms about conquest. Casting the invaders as “civilized” and the indigenous peoples as “savages,” opposing “moral societies” to “lascivious people,” “pious” vs. “pagan,” “peaceful” vs. “warlike,” or even “human” vs. “animal” implicitly justifies the violence meted out to indigenous peoples, who in some way can be viewed as opposing “progress” or “destiny.” Invaders expend a lot of energy maintaining these distinctions, because if they break down, the indigenous peoples begin to look as fully human as the invaders…which makes dispossessing, exploiting, and killing them look uncomfortably like theft, oppression, and murder.
.
These are precisely the categories that Anglo-America employed to shape its identity and that of the Native peoples of the continent. Literature, such as Robert Bird’s Nick of the Woods, popularized the image of the bloodthirsty redskin. Political discourse attributed indigenous resistance to Western civilization and Christianity to inferior intelligence or a primitive moral sensibility. Francis Parkman, the foremost American historian of the 19th Century, summed it all up with remarkable simplicity when he described the Indian as “man, wolf, and devil all in one.”
.
One problem is that reality exposes these projections for the pernicious fabrications they are. The early colonists would not have survived had not indigenous peoples imparted to them their rich agricultural wisdom. The eloquence and acuity of indigenous orators consistently impressed colonial listeners. Indigenous cultures were so strong and sophisticated that many scholars have conjectured that were it not for the epidemics that ravaged Native peoples (at mortality rates that in some cases approached ninety percent), the whole colonial enterprise might have turned out very differently.
.
The other problem is that even the invader recognizes the falsity of the constructions. Guilt and misgiving leak through in stories that exemplify the nobility of the indigenous peoples and portray invaders “going Native.” The result is an ambivalent, schizoid invader identity.
.
This bifurcated identity is expressed in Avatar by the earth people’s distance from the peoples of Pandora. The individuals involved in the Avatar Program are in Pandora but not of Pandora; they interact with the Na’vi through their avatars. They remain in an earthlike environment and among their own people but become indigenous through their avatar bodies. They are earth minds and identities clothed in Pandora bodies – not all that different from Americans who put on Native dress and mimic Native practices at summer camps, youth organizations, and sporting events.
.
Dr. Grace Augustine and Jake Sully comprise a complementary ambivalence: woman and man, brains and brawn, controlled and impulsive. Life among the Na’vi exposes the evil they are a part of and they become renegades. Like all renegades, they expose the Invader’s fiction and thus are singled out for particular hatred and violence.
.
In the biblical conquest narrative, the Gibeonite story (Joshua 9) dismantles the “godly us” vs. “ungodly them” polarity and humanizes the indigenous peoples. Joshua presents the Canaanite kings as the epitome of hostile indigenous power, but the Gibeonites (like Israel) do not have a king. Like Rahab, their indigenous counterpart, they are cunning and opportunistic. (Traits prized by Israel. Remember Jacob?). They alone praise Yhwh and acclaim God’s mighty acts of salvation. They trick Israel’s leaders into making a treaty and are eventually assigned to service at the altar – the holiest location in Israel and the center of invaders’ community. As a whole, the story presents them as more faithful representations of the people of God than the Israelites.
.
Avatar and Joshua take invader ambivalence in different directions; invaders are incorporated into the indigenous community in the former, indigenous into the invader in the latter. Both, however, highlight the ways that conquest narratives construct identities in order to justify conquest. And both challenge Americans to consider how Manifest Destiny configures contemporary attitudes and actions.
The Methodist Blogs Daily Links-- Tuesday 4.27.10
Any Methoblogger who would like a link included in the MBDL, email your post to me at umweeklyroundup(at)yahoo(dot)com. Your linke will be posted within two weekdays. No blog will be listed in the MBDL more than once in a week.Monday, April 26, 2010
Do Science and Faith Conflict?
The Methodist Blogs Daily Links-- Monday 4.26.10
Any Methoblogger who would like a link included in the MBDL, email your link to me at umweeklyroundup(at)yahoo(dot)com. Your link will be posted within two weekdays. No blog will be linked more than once in a week.Sunday, April 25, 2010
A Prayer for the Fourth Sunday of Easter
O God, whose Son Jesus is the good shepherd of your people; Grant that when we hear his voice we may know him who calls us each by name, and follow where he leads; who, with you and the Holy Spirit, lives and reigns, one God, for ever and ever. Amen.Saturday, April 24, 2010
Weekend Whimsy 2010.1
A preacher went to his church office on Monday morning and discovered a dead mule in the churchyard, He called the police. Since there did not appear to be any foul play, the police referred the preacher to the health department.The Methodist Blogs Weekly Roundup 2010.9.220
Any Methoblogger who would like a link included in the Methodist Blogs Daily Links (MBDL), email your link to me at umweeklyroundup@yahoo.com. Your link will be posted within two weekdays. No blog will be linked more than once in a week.Friday, April 23, 2010
Yes, Indeed... The Christian Left and the Christian Right Are Just Two Sides of the Same Coin
Scot McKnight at Jesus Creed is posting a series on James Hunter's new book, To Change the World: The Irony, Tragedy, and Possibility of Christianity in the Late Modern World. In the book Hunter offers critique of Christians on the political left and the political right, James Dobson and Jim Wallis, et al. In Scot's third post, he analyzes Hunter's critique of the right, and in today's post he takes a look at Hunter's critique of the left.The Methodist Blogs Daily Links-- Friday 4.23.10
Any Methoblogger who would like a link included in the MBDL, email your link to me at umweeklyroundup@yahoo.com. Your link will be posted within two weekdays. No blog will be linked more than once in a week.Thursday, April 22, 2010
Truth is Stranger than Fiction 2010.7
Burglars break into prison to steal TVs: Minimum-security prison robbed twice while prisoners were on furloughsThe Methodist Blogs Daily Links-- Thursday 4.22.10
Any Methoblogger who would like a link included in the MBDL, email your link to me at umweeklyroundup@yahoo.com. Your link will be posted within two weekdays. No blog will be linked more than once in a week.Some of the latest from the Methoblogosphere:
Tim Good writes on religion and politics.
It's inspection day for Graham Peacock.
Lorna Koskela shouts, "Don't mess with me! I belong to God!"
Kathy James posts on two kinds of hospitality.
Some thoughts on killing weeds from Cathy Turner.
Angela Shier-Jones comments on emerging ministers and the liturgical calendar.
Sky McCracken counsels us to put on Christ and wear him always.
"Christ Caring for People through People"-- a sermon by Ken Carter.
Joseph Slife says the UMC is worth fighting for.
Andy Bryan reminds us that attitude matters.
Wednesday, April 21, 2010
One Further Example of the Problematic Nature of Rights Language
The chief of the European Union has declared that traveling on vacation is a human right, and that the poor should be subsidized so that they can travel to destinations beyond their own narrow borders (story here). Antonio Tajani, states, "Travelling for tourism today is a right. The way we spend our holidays is a formidable indicator of our quality of life."My spouse, Carol, and I enjoy traveling. I wish everyone could travel who wants to do so. I remember when I was a young pastor with two young children, making just above the minimum salary and having school loans to pay. Carol and I would travel out of town with our two daughters on vacation every year. We did so because I knew that in my profession if I stayed at home, I would not get a vacation. I did not even think or wish that someone would pay for our vacations out of town. Carol and I saved every month each year for the next year's vacation. In order to do that, we had to go without things during the year. We could not have it all and we did not expect to have it all. We knew that if we were going to get some family time away where we would not be interrupted, we needed to make it a priority. We made it so. We said "no" to other expenditures during the year so we could pack up the van with our daughters and all their "stuff" to make our way down the road to new destinations.
The idea that traveling on vacation is a right and therefore should be subsidized is frankly absurd. But even more significantly it highlights the even greater problem of rights language. Once again, it is revealed what I have said on my blog for some time is true... rights language is more trouble than it is worth and Christians should just jettison it from their moral vocabulary. Rights language by necessity leads to rampant individualism which leads to selfish assertions of what one is owed. In other words, rights language leads to a sense of entitlement.
There are those who would say in response that just because somebody asserts the notion of an absurd right to travel does not mean that all rights language is incorrect. Fair enough... but I continue to challenge those Christians who want to hang on to rights language to give me criteria as to what constitutes a right. Why is one thing a right and not another? I have yet to hear from anyone on this.
I have many intelligent readers of this blog who disagree with me on this. I want to hear from you. How would you respond to this idea that travel is a right and ought to be subsidized by taxpayers? And if you reject the argument of the EU Chief, how do you still continue to argue for the validity of something called "rights?"
The Methodist Blogs Daily Links-- Wednesday 4.21.10
Any Methoblogger who would like a link included in the MBDL, email your link to me at umweeklyroundup@yahoo.com. Your link will be posted within two weekdays. No blog will be linked more than once in a week.Tuesday, April 20, 2010
Joshua in 3-D: Biblical Conquest and Manifest Destiny #2
Today we continue Dr. Dan Hawk's series on Biblical Conquest and Manifest Destiny. The publisher of Dan's new book, Wipf and Stock, is offering all readers of this blog a 40% discount on Joshua in 3-D for those who order a copy by May 16th. You must order from their website and you must insert the coupon code "HAWK40."+ + + + + + +
.
This is precisely the reversal of perspective that the biblical story of Rahab accomplishes (Josh 2:1-24). Biblical readers know who the good guys and the bad girl are in this story. But as it unfolds, Rahab expresses the qualities that Israelites admired, and she is the only person in the story to praise God. By the end of the story, readers find themselves identifying with the indigenous woman rather than “the good guys,” just as earthbound viewers find themselves identifying with Neytiri and the peoples of Pandora.
The Methodist Blogs Daily Links-- Tuesday 4.20.10
Any Methoblogger who would like a link included in the MBDL, email your link to me at umweeklyroundup@yahoo.com. Your link will be posted within two weekdays. No blog will be linked more than once in a week.Take a look at these links from the Methoblogosphere:
Bob Bryan reflects on loving our neighbor as ourselves.
"Restoring Eyesight"-- a sermon by Michael Daniel.
Henry Neufeld on Adrian Warnock on the doctrine of Scripture.
Pam Webster writes on restoration.
Dave Perry ponders photography and the art of pastoral ministry.
The Word of God must not be muzzled! says Kim Fabricius.
Some thoughts on faith healing from Deb Spaulding.
Dan Dick comments on the time for change.
Joseph Yoo will see you later.
Same program, bigger church-- a narrative from Questing Parson.
Monday, April 19, 2010
Question of the Day???
In Germany, public denial of the Holocaust is illegal. Would you support a similar law in your country of residence? Why or why not?The Methodist Blogs Daily Links-- Monday 4.19.10
Any Methoblogger who would like a link included in the MBDL, email your link to me at umweeklyroundup@yahoo.com. Your link will be posted within two weekdays. No blog will be linked more than once in a week.Sunday, April 18, 2010
Do You Love Me?
Today's audio sermon from John 21:1-19The Quotable C.S. Lewis #29: Poetry Replaces Grammar
"Those who have attained everlasting life in the vision of God doubtless know very well that it is no mere bribe, but the very consummation of their earthly discipleship; but we who have not yet attained it cannot know this in the same way, and cannot even begin to know it at all except by continuing to obey and finding the first reward of our obedience in our increasing power to desire the ultimate reward. Just in proportion as the desire grows, our fear lest it should be mercenary desire will die away and finally be recognized as an absurdity. But probably this will not, for most of us, happen in a day; poetry replaces grammar, gospel replaces law, longing transforms obedience, as gradually as the tide lifts a grounded ship."A Prayer for the Third Sunday of Easter
O God, whose blessed Son made himself known to his disciples in the breaking of bread: Open the eyes of our faith, that we may behold him in all his redeeming work; who lives and reigns with you, in the unity of the Holy Spirit, one God, now and for ever. Amen.Saturday, April 17, 2010
A New Look for the Methodist Blogs Weekly Roundup
As you no doubt have noticed, the MBWR has been hit and miss lately-- more miss than hit. It has simply become too much for me to keep up with in posting all at once. At the same time, judging from the hits on my blog when I post the Weekly Roundup, it is clearly something the Methoblogosphere reads in good numbers.Friday, April 16, 2010
Theological Precision and Narrative Imagination
Anyone who knows me knows that as a Christian I proudly stand in the Nicene-Chalcedonian tradition. Every time I confess the Nicene Creed in worship I do so with deep conviction. I am unapologetically trinitarian and I resist any attempts at modern modalist reconfigurations of the essential Christian doctrine of God. I firmly believe in the bodily resurrection of Jesus and I strongly object to any attempt to have a resurrected Jesus without his actual earthly body.I love theology and I love the necessary precision of theological language. But I also love the imaginative narrative that displays theology in ways that speak to the head and to the heart, which is why I thoroughly enjoyed reading the book, The Shack, many months ago, and found myself rather baffled at so many of the very negative appraisals of the book on theological grounds from other Christians. Casting aside the not-to-be-taken seriously aspersions of the book as juvenile and sophomoric literature (I suppose one would have to be juvenile and sophomoric to know), what I loved about the book was that in a wonderfully imaginative way it dealt with doctrine, relating it to the always deeply relevant and timely philosophical and theological matters that relate to the problem of evil, forgiveness, the nature of God, and God's work in this world by God's very presence. To be sure, there were times when I didn't agree with a particular narrative move the author, Paul Young, made in a portrayal, but then again, I have yet to always agree with every scholarly constructive theological treatment I have read.
Without precise theological language, the great doctrines of our faith have no boundaries that give them their distinctive character. Without narrative imagination our doctrines will appear to many to be somehow beside the point of life. Theologians may prefer to read something more substantive like Karl Barth, and I love Barth, but they need to know that the folks in the pews (and outside the pews as well) are not reading the great Swiss-German theologian; they are reading Paul Young.
I heard Paul Young speak yesterday at Ashland Theological Seminary. If you ever get an opportunity to hear him you must make the effort. As I listened to Paul, I became rather angered at the charge of heresy that has been leveled against him by those, who may know their theology, but know little about the nature of true heresy, as well as having no idea how to express theological truth in a way that makes a difference in people's lives. C.S. Lewis often complained that the biggest problem with theologians was that they lacked imagination. If Lewis were still alive he would know that little has changed.
There are times when I have wondered if Jesus was accused of "heresy" when he compared the kingdom of God to a mustard seed. On occasion I have considered the possibility that Jesus was charged with a less than orthodox doctrine of God when he, in story form, compared God to the father who gladly threw aside his dignity and self-respect to welcome home a wayward son. There have been times when I thought that perhaps Jesus was ridiculed by the trained theologians for his portrayal of God as an unjust judge.
I love reading theology. I enjoy parsing terminology and honing the sharp edges of doctrine into something finely tuned and precise. But I also enjoy reading the imaginative narratives that help me think theologically about life and faith in ways I had never considered.
I am an unapologetic Nicene-Chalcedonian trinitarian theologian; and I applaud Paul Young for his portrayal of the Trinity and his narrative display of some of our most significant beliefs and convictions in The Shack.
Thursday, April 15, 2010
All Justice Is Social Justice
Political pundit Glenn Beck, who has a TV show on the former state-run media outlet during the Bush Administration, FOX News, created quite stir recently in reference to his comments on social justice and leftist agendas. The Christian blogosphere has been quite abuzz with responses to Beck's very misinformed views. Even the current state-run media outlet under the Obama Administration, MSNBC, has made much of the hoopla simply as a way to bash Beck. Their views are just as misinformed.Tuesday, April 13, 2010
Joshua in 3-D: Biblical Conquest and Manifest Destiny #1
For the next five Tuesdays (including this one), one of my colleagues from Ashland Theological Seminary will be a guest blogger here. Dr. L. Daniel Hawk is Professor of Old Testament and Hebrew. Among his publications he has written a commentary on the Book of Joshua for the Berit Olam series. He is an excellent OT scholar and is quite conversant in postmodernism. When I have a perplexing question in Old Testament, he is the first person I seek out for his opinion.Monday, April 12, 2010
Divine Graffiti
Isaiah 49:8-18The latter chapters of the book of Isaiah are written in the context of Israel's exile in Babylon. In 586 B.C. the southern kingdom of Judah was conquered and most of the inhabitants of Jerusalem were led off to a strange land to live. Exiled from their homeland and wondering why God had allowed them to suffer so, these latter chapters in the prophet are written in part to encourage God's people Israel to remain faithful in spite of their circumstances and in spite of the fact that they may wonder, at times, what good their faith is for them as they live their lives.
There were those in Israel who likely blamed God for their misery, but first they needed to blame themselves. Their exile was their fault. For several centuries they continually violated God's law, they worshiped false gods, lived immorally, put up with and even supported corrupt leadership; and they trusted more in themselves than in the divine one who had called them. Now they were away from their homeland living in a strange place. Often, the first step in dealing with a problem is to admit that you are the one who created it.
Nevertheless, having said that, at some point, God's people were surely wondering when enough was enough. Of course, they had made the mess they now found themselves in, but when would the price be paid, when would penance be sufficient, and at what point would Israel be allowed to begin again?
It is not easy to put life in a nice and neat order; neither is it possible to understand completely how God works in each and every situation. For we mortals time flies when we are having fun, and it drags on in the midst of difficult days. God, who stands outside of time in eternity, sees from a vantage point we can only wonder about. We wish God would work in our time, but God is the one who moves with us in time expecting that we continue to trust and live in faith, even though we wonder when and where and how we might find relief. If the people of God are to be faithful, they must be patient.
Through Isaiah God promises that in his divine time, he will deliver his people. It may not come soon enough for them, but it will arrive nonetheless:
Thus says the LORD: In a time of favour I have answered you, on a day of salvation I have helped you; I have kept you and given you as a covenant to the people, to establish the land, to apportion the desolate heritages; saying to the prisoners, 'Come out', to those who are in darkness, 'Show yourselves.' They shall feed along the ways, on all the bare heights shall be their pasture; they shall not hunger or thirst, neither scorching wind nor sun shall strike them down, for he who has pity on them will lead them, and by springs of water will guide them. And I will turn all my mountains into a road, and my highways shall be raised up 49:8-11).
God does indeed promise deliverance and restoration; in the meantime they must know and trust that God is with them. God has not abandoned his people in the past and he will not do so in the present. There are those who say that the Almighty has forgotten; that perhaps God has moved on to another people, but Isaiah insists that this is not true.
Can a woman forget her nursing-child, or show no compassion for the child of her womb? Even these may forget, yet I will not forget you. See, I have inscribed you on the palms of my hands; your walls are continually before me (49:15-16).
It surely seems impossible for a mother to forget the child she carried and gave birth to. Sadly, there are some who do, even though most do not. For most mothers the thoughts of a child are always close at hand even when they are away from home. But God's love and compassion for us are deeper and more profound than the most loving and compassionate mom. The analogy of God inscribing our names on his hands is not an image meant to convey that God has to do something so he will not forget us; rather it is meant to demonstrate that God loves us so much, that he purposely puts us in front of him because of the joy God has in loving us.
Most homes have pictures of family on the walls and other places throughout the house, not for the purpose of having to be reminded of whom we are related to, but rather we display the images of those persons who mean so much to us. Photos of family members in our homes and in our wallets and purses do not serve as reminders; they are displays of love. We put their photos in prominent places precisely because we could never forget them.
And so it is in Isaiah. God has put our names before him, not because he is afraid of forgetting us, but it is a display of his love for us. And in knowing this, it serves as a reminder to us that in the midst of life and, yes, even in the midst of its difficulties, God has not forgotten about us, God has not abandoned us, God has not left us to ourselves.
God takes our lives and brings them into his life; and while the character of God never changes, God nevertheless journeys with us as we grow in relationship with him. Isaiah reminds us that God's divine graffiti does not serve as a reminder to God, but a rather it is a reminder to us that God is indeed with us.
And perhaps Isaiah 49 is a preview of a day, centuries later, when God in the flesh would have our names, our lives, inscribed into his hands with the nails of a cross.
Sunday, April 11, 2010
An Unimaginable Rumor
Today's audio sermon from Luke 24:13-35Saturday, April 10, 2010
Oops! The MBWR
Quote of the Day: Ain't Politics Fun...
From Michael Kruse of the Kruse Kronicle: "Democratic Party Image Drops to Record Low-- And all this tells you is that the Dems have now fallen into the gutter with the GOP. Ain't politics fun with Baby Boomers in charge?"Caption Contest 2010.4... And the Winner Is...
Mark: Egg-pacalypse
Friday, April 09, 2010
The Character of Our Discontent
I want to give a special thank you to Bob Cornwall for his very helpful review of my soon to be published book, The Character of Our Discontent: Old Testament Portraits for Contemporary Times.Thursday, April 08, 2010
When It Comes to Justification by Faith, How Protestant Was John Wesley?
I just finished reading William Abraham's book, Wesley for Armchair Theologians. I have been asked by several people over the years what I thought of the book; and even though I love Abraham's work, I didn't want to recommend something I hadn't read, so I decided to take up his book and read.Wednesday, April 07, 2010
It's Not Just the Last Act of the Play; It's the Entire Drama: Some Reflections Post Holy Week
I was raised in a very low-church Protestant tradition. What that meant for me was that the church we attended never had Holy Week services and my family never attended Holy Week services anywhere else. Of course, that also meant that we did not observe Ash Wednesday nor Advent, but my focus in this post is on Holy Week. We celebrated Christ's resurrection every Easter, but Maundy Thursday and Good Friday was something the Catholics did, and I was raised in a church environment that determined what worship practices were to be done or omitted based upon whether or not the Catholics did or didn't do it. So when I asked, as a young boy, why we did not observe Good Friday, I was told, "The Catholics do that."
