A Weblog Dedicated to the Discussion of the Christian Faith and 21st Century Life

A Weblog Dedicated to the Discussion of the Christian Faith and 21st Century Life

This blog is a place for the discussion of all things significant and not so important as well. If you read something you disagree with, don't get angry; post a comment and join the discussion.

Passionate and lively debate is encouraged in the context of civility. Comments that include name calling and profanity will be deleted.

Wednesday, March 31, 2010

Quote of the Day: That Methodist Preacher in Philadelphia

Philadelphia, 1776

"On Sundays, the one day of respite from Congress, he [John Adams] was at church most of the day, attending services twice, even three times. With numerous denominations to choose from (everything except Congregational) he tried nearly all-- the Anglican Christ Church, the meetinghouses of the Methodists, Baptists, Presbyterians, Quakers, the German Moravians-- and passed judgment on them all, both their music and the comparative quality of their preaching. The Reverend Thomas Coombe of Christ Church was 'sprightly' and distinct. 'But I am not charmed,' wrote Adams. 'His style was indifferent.' Indifference was a quality Adams found difficult to tolerate. The Methodist preacher was another matter 'He reaches the imagination and touches the passions very well.'"

+ + + + + + +

From David McCullough, John Adams (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2001), 83-84.

Tuesday, March 30, 2010

Clark Pinnock, Alzheimer's, and Open Theology

Word is now public that theologian Clark Pinnock has Alzheimer's and that his theology writing days appear done.

Pinnock is perhaps the most well known proponent of open theology, which is not, as it has often been misinterpreted, process theology.

A wonderful summary of open theology is given by Thomas Jay Oord:

Open theology as Pinnock presents it depicts God as a self-sufficient, though relational, Trinitarian being. God graciously relates to the world as one self-limited out of respect for the genuine freedom of creatures. Creatures genuine influence God. God is transcendent and immanent, has changing and unchanging aspects, gives to and receives from others, is present to all things, and has supreme power. God’s love, says Pinnock, includes responsiveness, generosity, sensitivity, openness, and vulnerability.

Open theology rejects traditional theologies that portray God as an aloof monarch. Influential theologians of yesteryear often portrayed God as completely unchangeable, ultimately all determining, and irresistible. By contrast, Pinnock says the biblical vision presents a loving God who seeks relationship with free creatures. "The Christian life involves a genuine interaction between God and human beings," he says. "We respond to God’s gracious initiatives and God responds to our responses . . . and on it goes."

The future is not entirely settled, according to Open theology. This means that while God knows all possibilities, God does not know with certainty what free creatures will actually do until creatures act. Classic views of God's foreknowledge are incompatible with creaturely freedom, says Pinnock. "If choices are real and freedom significant," he argues, "future decisions cannot be exhaustively known."

Pinnock says of his current situation, "I want to inform you that I am now middle stage Alzheimer's. I will not be able to do my writing etc. I am 73 years now, and I've enjoyed my biblical three score and ten. I am not bitter. I have had a good life."

May God bless Clark Pinnock.

+ + + + + + +

Opinion Central Poll 2010.9: Final Results

Monday, March 29, 2010

A Suggestion for the Signers of the Civility Covenant

It has been reported that 115 church leaders from around the USA, who have some very different political views, have signed a Civility Covenant. "[T]he document says that churches have too often 'reflected the political divisions of our culture rather than the unity we have in the body of Christ.'

I agree completely and I applaud this project as should all believers. Leaders with very different political views from Jim Wallis to Chuck Colson from Harry Jackson to Morna Murray have signed on. It appears that some in Congress have called on church leaders to assist in this, and I believe it is appropriate and important for us to respond. All of us know how vitriolic the political wars currently are with Christians getting involved in the shouting and yelling as well.

But I also have a suggestion. I would ask those church leaders-- Jim Wallis and Chuck Colson and others-- to ask the members of Congress to sign their own civility pledge. Members of both parties often lead the way and set the tone by their name calling, insults and gross mischaracterizations of the other side. It seems somewhat ineffectual for us outside of Washington to tone it down, while those inside Washington continue to spew their demagoguery. After all, we get to hear them each night on the news and the cable spin shows.

It's just a suggestion. I think, first and foremost, we who follow Jesus need to bear witness to the need for civility; and by demonstrating our love for one another even in the midst of the disagreements, we can bear witness to the powers that be that civil discourse is much to be preferred.

But I think this is also an opportunity for Christians to say to those in Washington, "You'd be a better empire if you didn't insult and demean each other, and mischaracterize each other's positions."

Just a thought...

Sunday, March 28, 2010

Palm Sunday - Gloria Laus

A Prayer for Palm Sunday

Almighty and everliving God, in your tender love for the human race you sent your Son our Savior Jesus Christ to take upon him our nature, and to suffer death upon the cross, giving us the example of his great humility: Mercifully grant that we may walk in the way of his suffering, and also share in his resurrection; through Jesus Christ our Lord, who lives and reigns with you and the Holy Spirit, one God, for ever and ever. Amen.

The Book of Common Prayer

Saturday, March 27, 2010

The Methodist Blogs Weekly Roundup 2010.8.219

Submit your post to umweeklyroundup@yahoo.com by noon EST on Saturday to guarantee that your post is included.

If you discover that a link is not correct, please email me at the above address.

*Thanks to all for their email submissions!*

The week in review in the Methoblogosphere:

Dave Nichols reminds us that it is enough just to be devoted.

Dale Tedder writes on the evolution of a call to ministry.

Pat LaPorte posts on the empty tomb, cookies, and Scriptures.

Andy Stoddard reflects on being a pastor versus being a son. Best of the Methoblogosphere!

Mitch Lewis reports on his visit to Bonhoeffer's place of martyrdom at Flossenbürg.

Bishop Robert Schnase comments on paying Caesar and giving to God.

Bishop William Willimon is thinking resurrection.

Do you want to get control of your mind on the road to perfection? Read Shane Raynor.

Jim Parsons posts a young clergy rant.

"On the Road to Jerusalem"-- a sermon by Michael Daniel.

Henry Neufeld explains why he is an independent voter.

Pam Webster wants us to give it up for Jesus.

Daniel McLain Hixon writes on the Angelus Prayer for all of us.

Salvaging Easter according to Dave Perry. Best of the Methoblogosphere!

Richard Hall is on the move.

Do you have a spiritual tick? Read Deb Spaulding.

United Methodists wanting to... What? A post from Dan Dick.

Joseph Yoo cogitates on things that happen at Starbucks.

To be a member or not a member?... That is the question for Questing Parson.

Richard Heyduck thanks his wife, Christi.

Greg Hazelrig posts his thought for the day on Luke 17:1-2.

Kim Matthews reminds us to carry the cross.

Dave Faulkner on Richard Bauckham.

What is the price ticket for an emotional, sensuous act of worship? Read David Hallam.

Biblical interpretation for church and world from Brian Russell.

Hope in times of doubt from Sally Coleman.

More on why Dave Camphouse joined the blogosphere.

Jeremy Smith posts on critiquing with accountability.

Dave Allen reflects on Catholics and bureaucrats.

Tony Mitchell asks, "Do you understand?"

Reflections on restoration from Lorna Koskela.

Kathy James has been thinking a lot about community lately.

Cathy Turner ponders bearing one another's burdens.

Geoffrey Lentz writes on social justice and the ever present poor.

Angela Shier-Jones is rehearsing the opening line.

Sky Lowe-McCracken asks, "Why have the church? Just be a Democrat or a Republican.

---

A Special MBWR Listing of the Health Care Reform Debate in the Methoblogosphere:

Some thoughts from John Battern on how the General Board of Church and Society is out of touch with most United Methodists.

Ken Carter posts on why health care is always being reformed.

Chris Roberts believes that the health care reform bill works against the UM Social Principles.

Joseph Slife comments on the Speaker of the House thanking the UMC for helping to pass the health care reform bill.

Andy Bryan writes on why he didn't write anything on health care.

Cogitations on the health care bill from John Meunier.

Friday, March 26, 2010

The Allocation of Limited Resources

I first became acquainted with Michael Kruse as a guest blogger at Scot McKnight's Jesus Creed. His posts are well informed and thought provoking.

Michael has started a series based on his reading of James Halteman's book, The Clashing Worlds of Economics and Faith. It looks to be a good discussion.

I would encourage you to check out the discussion and his blog in general. You are welcome to comment on his post here and we can start a discussion, but if you really want an expert response, you need to comment on Michael's site.

Thursday, March 25, 2010

Supersizing the Last Supper

Is this another example of art imitating life?



In your opinion what is to be made of this?

Ten Things That Drive Me Crazy About Working for a Church

A spot-on post by Tim Schraeder.

Would anyone care to add to the list in the comments? Or just add your comments in general?

+ + + + + + +

Wednesday, March 24, 2010

Want to Win a Gift Card to Barnes & Noble?

Check it out here.

The Twenty Most Important Theologians in the Wesleyan Tradition

Jonathan Marlowe at The Ivy Bush is doing a series of posts on the twenty most important theologians (his take) in the Wesleyan Tradition.

Here's his list (with links) so far:





Helpful stuff indeed. Check out the four links and keep checking his blog for future posts in the series.

Opinion Central Poll 2010.8: Final Results

Monday, March 22, 2010

Another Good One From Hauerwas

"...[W]e believe that it is time for the church to recognize that it is in a missionary situation in the very culture it helped to create. Of course,... the church ought to be in a missionary situation at any time and in any culture. However, it happens that we have lived during a time when Christians thought that they had made themselves a home from which they could become missionaries to others. Because we Western, Northern-European Christians had succeeded in fashioning a 'Christian' culture, we could now speak to everyone else's culture. That was a tragic mistake."

"Christian recognition of their status as 'resident aliens' was muted when Christianity became a civilizational religion. That project, which in many ways is quite explicable, was the attempt to turn the world into the kingdom. It was the attempt to force God's kingdom into being by making the worship of God unavoidable. It was the attempt to make Christian convictions available without conversion and transformation."

"It is unclear who started looking like whom first, whether Southern Baptist pastors started looking like Texas politicians, or Texas politicians started looking like Southern Baptist pastors. Whatever genetic relations, Christians have been forever tempted to derive our status from those forms of power valued by the wider culture. The United Methodist Book of Discipline is no longer a handbook for church discipline but resembles a handbook for employees of IBM. Pastors are routinely relegated to the ranks of 'the health care professions.' In the process, the church loses its way. No one listens to a church which speaks the same truths that can be heard anywhere other than church."

+ + + + + + +

From In Good Company: The Church as Polis (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1995), 53, 54, 55, 56.

Quote of the Day-- Stanley Hauerwas

"The lordship of Christ is the center that guides all that Christians do and all they hold dear. Christians, therefore, must subordinate or even reject those desires and loves that make it impossible for them to be disciples of Jesus."

"Attempts to defend the cause of the church before-- or by using-- secular standards and processes cannot help but betray the presumption that the true meaning of history is to be located somewhere else than the church. According to Yoder, the view that what God is doing is being done primarily through the framework of society as a whole and not through the Christian community is the presumption that lies behind the Constantinian accommodation of the church to the world. Put simply, Constantinianism is the attempt to make Christianity necessary, to make the church at home in the world, in a manner that witness is no longer required."

"To be sure, Constantinianism has taken many different forms throughout history, but the common thread that constitutes the family resemblance between its various forms is that the validity of the church of Jesus Christ, and of the New Testament is to be judged by standards derived from the world. According to Yoder, 'secular revelation' originally was assumed to come by way of the power of the emperor of Rome. But for those of us constituted by the secularism of modernity, this 'revelation' is captured in the presumption that our only alternative is to believe in the fantastic capacity of our democratic and technocratic societies to make things work..."

"It is a mistake, therefore, when in the interest of 'justifying' our convictions or of being socially 'responsible,' Christians think that we must translate our language into the dominant language of our surroundings. The early Christians did not ask, "Shall messianic Jews enter the Hellenistic world and adjust to its concepts. Their question could not be whether or not to enter the world of Hellenism, but how to be there."

+ + + + + + +

From With the Grain of the Universe: The Church's Witness and Natural Theology (Grand Rapids: Brazos Press, 2001), 221-222.

Do We Really Understand What It Means to Ask God for Our Daily Bread?

Many years ago on a mission trip in Haiti, our group was ministering in the isolated mountains in the west near the Dominican Republic. They village where we stayed was where the road ended. To say it was a “road” was an exaggeration. Early one Sunday morning, we mounted horses and made our way to another village, even more remote, to worship with the believers there. We gathered with them in their sanctuary, a rectangular banana leaf hut. The worship was quite meaningful even though none of us understood Creole. Nevertheless, we didn’t need to speak their language to know that God was being worshiped and Jesus was being glorified.

After worship we gathered at the pastor’s house, a small hut, and we were served dinner. Some of us noticed that none of our Haitian brothers and sisters joined us, but for some reason we didn’t think to ask. We ate a variety of foods and when we were finished, we were quite satisfied.

Later in the day when we were on our way back to the village of our temporary residence, the missionary who was hosting us told us something that made the rest of the trip quite quiet. He informed us that our Haitian brothers and sisters of the village had given up their daily meal, the food they had for that day, so that we could eat. They had given up their daily bread so that we could have ours.

Do we really understand what it means to ask God for our daily bread? We who have more bread than we need? Somewhere, I can’t remember, Bishop William Willimon reminds us that most of us have in the affluent West have more bread than we need. Indeed, more of us in the affluent West will die of too much bread rather than too little bread. How serious can we be when we pray each Sunday, “Give us this day our daily bread?”

I have no doubt when the brother in Christ in Haiti utters that line in prayer, it means something very different from when I pray it. I am sure that when the sister in Jesus offers that request to God in Ethiopia, it is sincere in a way that I cannot fathom. When I say, as I do every Sunday along with the rest of the congregation, “Give us this day our daily bread,” how desperate, and therefore, how sincere am I, in what I say?

Is it possible for me to understand what it means to ask God only for the bread I need for today, when I have bread in the freezer at home? Perhaps, when I ask God for my daily bread each week, such words should remind me of how I must give out of my abundance so that others, who pray the same words, will receive the bread they need just for the present day.

May I be so willing to give up my daily bread, so that others will receive theirs.

Sunday, March 21, 2010

A Prayer for the Fifth Sunday in Lent

O Almighty God, who alone canst order the unruly wills and affections of sinful men: Grant unto thy people that they may love the thing which thou commandest, and desire that which thou dost promise; that so, among the sundry and manifold changes of the world, our hearts may surely there be fixed where true joys are to be found; through Jesus Christ our Lord, who liveth and reigneth with thee and the Holy Spirit, one God, now and for ever. Amen.

The Book of Common Prayer

Saturday, March 20, 2010

The Methodist Blogs Weekly Roundup 2010.7.218

Submit your post to umweeklyroundup@yahoo.com by noon EST on Saturday to guarantee that your post is included.

If you discover that a link is not correct, please email me at the above address.

*Thanks to all for their email submissions!*

The week in review in the Methoblogosphere:

Craig L. Adams posts on Wesleyanism and Spirit Baptism.

Dave Nichols is giving us permission to smile during Lent.

On salt and Kingdom discipleship from Dale Tedder.

Angela Shier-Jones ponders a church swap.

Did Moses die of a broken heart? Read Pat LaPorte.

Mitch Lewis reminds us, "Unless you repent..."

Wayne Cook wonders if the United Methodist Church and the Church in general is missing the point.

Do you remember the good ole' days? Reminisce with Brian Vinson.

John Meunier ponders doubt, error, and pastoral ministry. Best of the Methoblogosphere!

Undermining the faith and the problem with seminary according to Lauren Porter.

Geoffrey Lentz writes on Glenn Beck on Christian Social Justice.

Bishop Robert Schnase reflects on paying to Caesar and giving to God.

Foolish preaching-- a post from Bishop William Willimon.

Will Deuel offers an ordination reboot for the twenty-first century.

Cathy Turner says, "Just Choose Jesus."

Kathy James wants us to take off our sunglasses.

Reflections on futile faith from Kevin Watson. Best of the Methoblogosphere!

Lorna Koskela is thinking... and blogging... outloud.

Andrew Stoddard is making changes in his daily blogging.

The nature of academic freedom according to Tony Mitchell.

Blake Huggins writes on Juan Luis Segundo and the theology of liberation.

Dave Allen comments on big government conservatives, libertarian lefties, and Glenn Beck.

Jeremy Smith cogitates on Stephen Colbert, Thessalonians, and lazy people.

Dave Camphouse on why he started blogging.

Smells, swords, and streams-- ponderings from Sally Coleman.

"Conversations in the Valley: Life that Demands Explanation"-- a sermon by Brian Russell.

Andy Bryan reflects on the Matthew and Mark's versions of Jesus' prayer in the Garden of Gethsemane.

David Hallam reminds us that while change is difficult, it can have its rewards.

Dave Faulkner preaches on the aroma of extravagance.

If you wonder if the risk is worth it, read Kim Matthews.

Greg Hazelrig posts his thought for the day on Luke 21:5-6.

Steve Heyduck is looking for a few old men.

Richard Heyduck ponders bumper sticker thinking.

Sometimes things don't get done-- a narrative from Questing Parson.

Joseph Yoo wonders where our sense of entitlement comes from.

Joseph Slife states why the United Methodist Church cannot condone homosexuality.

A reasonable post from Dan Dick on irrational rationalizations.

Ken Carter says, "Yes," to social justice.

Deb Spaulding reflects on acting like a two year old.

Olive Morgan posts on only having a decade to bring nuclear weapons under control.

Cogitations on the Massachusetts Senate election redux from Joel Betow.

Gavin Richardson states that the U.S. government is not his church.

Continued reflections on Lent from Chris Roberts.

Dave Perry posts on no more shackles.

Daniel McLain Hixon reports on the Feast of St. Cyril of Jerusalem.

Pam Webster counsels us to let our hair down in love.

Henry Neufeld posits an inconvenient truth on Israel and Palestine.

Some thoughts on restoring Methodism from Michael Daniel.

A success story from Jim Parsons on the ministry of laity.

Shane Raynor suggests why sin should horrify us.

Friday, March 19, 2010

The Political Left and the Political Right Should Pay Attention to This Wisdom

David Brooks hits it out of the park with his latest editorial. The political left and right should listen, but I doubt that they will. They have too much power and pork to give up for the common good.

Referring to British writer, Philip Blond, Brooks writes,

"Economically, Blond lays out three big areas of reform: remoralize the market, relocalize the economy and recapitalize the poor. This would mean passing zoning legislation to give small shopkeepers a shot against the retail giants, reducing barriers to entry for new businesses, revitalizing local banks, encouraging employee share ownership, setting up local capital funds so community associations could invest in local enterprises, rewarding savings, cutting regulations that socialize risk and privatize profit, and reducing the subsidies that flow from big government and big business."

"To create a civil state, Blond would reduce the power of senior government officials and widen the discretion of front-line civil servants, the people actually working in neighborhoods. He would decentralize power, giving more budget authority to the smallest units of government. He would funnel more services through charities. He would increase investments in infrastructure, so that more places could be vibrant economic hubs. He would rebuild the 'village college' so that universities would be more intertwined with the towns around them."
.
And my favorite line in the article: "The welfare state and the market state are now two defunct and mutually supporting failures."

You can read the entire editorial here.

+ + + + + + +

Thursday, March 18, 2010

The Voyage of the Dawn Treader

Coming to a theater near you... I am excited!

Stanley Hauerwas Thinks (Social) Justice is a Bad Idea

John Schmalzbauer, sociologist of religion writes the following:

Unlike Mr. Beck, Hauerwas thinks that “freedom” and “Christian America" are bad ideas. Like his interrogation of the J-word, his critique of these notions is rooted in the conviction that the Enlightenment assumptions of the modern state have corrupted Christian thinking. Like the philosopher Alasdair MacIntyre, he has challenged the provenance of such taken-for-granted concepts, questioning the influence of Kantian philosophy on contemporary ideas of justice. From this perspective, the key questions are, “Whose justice? Which rationality?”

You can read Schmalzbauer's entire post, here.

+ + + + + + +

Question of the Day???

In your view what makes a Christian hymn or contemporary song theologically superficial?

Wednesday, March 17, 2010

Adoption Amnesia

A previous edition of Reader's Digest tells the following true story:

Aunt Ruby and Uncle Arnie adopted a baby boy after five years of trying unsuccessfully to conceive. To their surprise, a short time after the adoption, Aunt Ruby discovered she was pregnant, and she gave birth to a boy.

One day when the two boys were eight and nine years old, the teller of the story was visiting Aunt Ruby, and a woman in the neighborhood came to visit.

Observing the children at play, the woman asked, "Which boy is yours, Ruby?"

"Both of them," replied Aunt Ruby.

The caller persisted, "But I mean, which one is adopted?"

Aunt Ruby did not hesitate. In her finest hour, she looked straight at her guest and replied, "I've forgotten."

St. Paul writes to the Romans, "For all who are led by the Spirit of God are children of God. For you did not receive a spirit of slavery to fall back into fear, but you received a spirit of adoption. When we cry, 'Abba! Father"' it is that very Spirit bearing witness with our spirit that we are children of God, and if children, then heirs, heirs of God and joint heirs with Christ-- if, in fact, we suffer with him so that we may also be glorified with him" (Romans 8:14-17).

To quote Forrest Gump, "That's all I have to say about that."

Tuesday, March 16, 2010

When You Have Nothing to Say, Let Someone Else Speak

I have to confess that I feel as if I have hit a dry time in my blogging of late. I am certainly not planning to give it up, but I have been staring blankly at my computer screen more and more of late. So, since I have nothing I really want to say today, I am going to link to some posts from people who have some significant things to say. Check out the following:






Enjoy!

Monday, March 15, 2010

Truth is Stranger than Fiction 2010.6

Sunday, March 14, 2010

God's Will Cannot be Thwarted

Today's audio sermon from Genesis 45:1-15

A Prayer for the Fourth Sunday in Lent

Gracious Father, whose blessed Son Jesus Christ came down from heaven to be the true bread which gives life to the world: Evermore give us this bread, that he may live in us, and we in him; who lives and reigns with you and the Holy Spirit, one God, now and for ever. Amen.

The Book of Common Prayer

Saturday, March 13, 2010

Caption Contest 2010.3... And the Winner Is...


Jim: "Sister Act 3 - The 'Piece' of Christ be with YOU!"

No Weekly Roundup

The MBWR will return next weekend. For those who emailed links to me, I will use them next week, unless you send me an updated post by next Satruday morning.

Thanks for your support of the MBWR.

Friday, March 12, 2010

On Why the Culture of Corruption in Washington Will Only Get Worse

In an interview this morning, pollster Scott Rasmussen said that consistently over the years when they poll people asking them whom they trust more, politicians or used car salesmen, the answer is consistently the same regardless of the political party in power. People trust the used car salesmen.

When the Republicans were in power of both the executive and the legislative branches from 2000-2006, the corruption scandals were numerous. Nancy Pelosi promised to "drain the swamp" if she and the Democrats were in charge, and she promised the most ethical Congress in history. Well, the swamp has not been drained and the culture of corruption continues as now Democrats are emerging as the ones in scandal; and as long as they are in power more moral lapses will no doubt come to light, not because they are Democrats, but because economic and political power seem to have a strong corrupting influence on politicians of all political stripes.

And what I am going to suggest in this post is that the swamp will only get more putrid and the culture of corruption will only become more pronounced. As government gets larger and larger and works to exercise even more control over our lives, politicians will by necessity end up with more power and less accountability. And too many politicians with power are like alcoholics with booze-- one drink is never enough; one piece of intrusive legislation is not sufficient. (A politician in the NY legislature has introduced a bill that would ban restaurants in The Empire State from using salt in any food preparation.)

It is all too easy for politicians with power to become arrogant while they fall in love with their own wisdom. In the Washington bubble, where intelligence is often divorced from reality, those in power fall into an "eat your peas!" mentality. With more power government acts more and more like an overbearing parent who treats the American people like children who do not know what's good for them. How else can the current irrational push to pass a terrible health care reform bill in light of clear opposition from the American people be explained?

Moreover, the more government intrudes into the lives of its citizens the more intense political lobbying becomes. When government becomes the "all-benevolent" benefactor in every arena of life, special interest groups increase in number and compete even harder for their portion that falls from the table of the Lords of the Manor in Washington. Favors here and favors there, and Congress will end up with more and more Denny Hasterts, Chris Dodds, Charley Rangels, and Tom DeLays. While government corruption has always been a problem, it will only become worse as government gets more "skin in the game," of the lives of the American people. And contrary to what many citizens wish, political lobbying may be curtailed in some ways, but it cannot be stopped completely because the Constitution guarantees the right of every citizen to petition the government.

And my comments apply to politicians from both political parties. In spite of the current hypocritical outrage now being expressed by the Republicans on fiscal responsibility and less government, they have been no more fiscally responsible nor less intrusive than the Democrats. And once they have power once again, they will likely not reverse the intrusions of the Democrats. The old adage that once the camel gets its nose in the tent it is impossible to keep the camel out is axiomatically true of Washington DC, no matter what the political landscape.

So, while used car salesmen will never be seen by the American people as trustworthy, they will continue to rate higher on the ethical scale than politicians, and we may find as time goes on, that the trust gap between the two will get even wider.

And that's bad news for politicians, not only for the ones who are currently in office, but also for the former Senators and Representatives who are looking for a job selling automobiles. It just may be that the used car business owners won't want to hire people who might give them a bad reputation.

+ + + + + + +

Cross-Posted at RedBlueChristian

Wednesday, March 10, 2010

Free E-Book: Exploring the Resurrection of Jesus

Biblical Archaeology Review is offering a free e-book entitled, Easter: Exploring the Resurrection of Jesus. Contributors include Hershel Shanks, N.T. Wright, and Marcus Borg.

I already have mine. Get yours here.

Word Cloud for February 2010

Here is the word cloud for my blog during the month of February.

I don't know why but I find this fascinating.


Wordle: ARB February 2010

Click on the image to enlarge

Tuesday, March 09, 2010

What Happened to All the Folks Screaming "Empire!"

I know I am not the only one who has noticed that all the Christians comparing the USA to the Roman Empire during the reign of George W. Bush are strangely silent now that we are under the emperorship of Barack Obama. And yet, how much of President Obama's foreign policy looks virtually the same as his predecessor.

Policy on Afghanistan-- virtually the same

Policy on Iraq-- virtually the same

Support for warrantless wiretapping-- the same

Support for many of the provisions of the Patriot Act-- virtually the same

Support for military tribunals-- virtually the same (The civilian trial scheduled for NY will most certainly revert back to a military court.)

Asserting executive privilege in order to keep lots of information secret-- the same

So, where are all those Christians, who for eight years were using the New Testament to critique Caesar George as a modern-like dictator? I do not deny that such a comparison was not completely false, but I only insist that such critiques be applied consistently.

I guess consistency is not to be preferred when it is your emperor residing at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.

As I have said in previous posts, people trot out the sorry cliche of "speaking truth to power" only when their people are not in power.

+ + + + + + +

Cross-Posted at RedBlueChristian

Sunday, March 07, 2010

Not a Pie-in-the-Sky Kind of Kingdom

Today's audio sermon from Revelation 21:1-5

A Prayer for the Third Sunday in Lent

Almighty God, you know that we have no power in ourselves to help ourselves: Keep us both outwardly in our bodies and inwardly in our souls, that we may be defended from all adversities which may happen to the body, and from all evil thoughts which may assault and hurt the soul; through Jesus Christ our Lord, who lives and reigns with you and the Holy Spirit, one God, for ever and ever. Amen.

The Book of Common Prayer

Saturday, March 06, 2010

The Methodist Blogs Weekly Roundup 2010.6.217

Submit your post to umweeklyroundup@yahoo.com by noon EST on Saturday to guarantee that your post is included.

If you discover that a link is not correct, please email me at the above address.

*Thanks to all for their email submissions!*

The week in review in the Methoblogosphere:

Dave Nichols is seeing through a small hole.

Dale Tedder and his wife are raising their daughter up in the Lord.

John Carney reflects on worship as a No-Twitter Zone.

Some thoughts and a request for help in understanding difficult Bible passages from Pat LaPorte.

Are we thinking ahead? Whose job is it? Two important questions that Sky Lowe-McCracken is asking the church.

Mitch Lewis writes on Lent as a corporate activity of the church.

Bishop Robert Schnase loves Sunday mornings! Best of the Methoblogosphere!

Thoughts from Bishop William Willimon on cruciform preaching.

Bishop Robert Hoshibata posts on hunger in these challenging times.

Shane Raynor believes that the UMC needs real reconciling ministries.

Jim Parsons ponders cheap grace and costly grace.

"Blind Indulgence"-- a sermon by Michael Daniel.

Henry Neufeld asks, "What would a successful UMC look like?"

Are you feeling the strain? Read Pam Webster.

Should atheists be choirmaster? Daniel McLain Hixon cogitates on the question.

Dave Perry counsels us to use the whole palette of our being.

Chris Roberts reflects on the second week of Lent.

Gavin Richardson is speaking and talking here and there.

Faith... culture... no problem... a post from Joel Betow.

Olive Morgan writes on church leaders urging politicians to take the pledge.

Have you ever been hung out to dry? Read Deb Spaulding.

The yearnings of a crazy heart according to Ken Carter.

Dan Dick deliberates on ReDo, UnDo, DoDo.

Joseph Slife posts on Dumbarton UMCs announcement that it will defy church law and perform same sex weddings.

Angela Shier-Jones comments on when Jesus came to church.

Joseph Yoo wants churches to quit undermining youth ministry.

Riding along with stress-- reflections from Questing Parson.

Richard Heyduck says, "Thanks! Mom and Dad."

Steve Heyduck confesses to being a hypocrite.

Greg Hazelrig posts his thought for the day on Luke 5:13.

Ponderments on transformational forgiveness from Kim Matthews.

Dave Faulkner comments on Easter Number One.

David Hallam reflects on unexpected guests at two Methodist Churches.

Andy Bryan posts a note to his foster kids. Best of the Methoblogosphere!

Do you preach or teach from Genesis 1-11? Brian Russell reminds us that we should.

Mad musings from Sally Coleman.

Dave Camphouse reports on the upcoming Change the World Webinar.

How many bars have you closed down? Lauren Porter wants to know.

Jeremy Smith revisits the tyranny of the SEO Church.

Andrew Conard will be ordained at Annual Conference. Godspeed Andrew!

Will Grady asks, "How do you teach children the Bible?"

Can we have holiness without biblical morality? John Meunier ponders the problem.

Brian Vinson posts on learning something new.

Did you know that Thomas Aquinas can explain your mortgage? Read Dave Allen.

Blake Huggins wonders if Brian McLaren goes far enough on narrative overlays.

"The Fruits of the Vineyard"-- a sermon by Tony Mitchell.

Andrew Stoddard posts reflections on Genesis 42:18-28, 1 Corinthians 5:6-6:8, and Mark 4:1-20.

Silence is golden, writes Lorna Koskela.

Kevin Watson is presenting a paper at the Wesleyan Theological Society.

Kathy James on journeying in Lent.

Three faith shaping questions from Cathy Turner.

Will Deuel ponders an inglourious problem.

Friday, March 05, 2010

Nude Church-- I Just Don't Know What to Say

Perhaps the most ridiculous comment the pastor uttered during the interview was that some of the biggest moments of Jesus' life happened when he was naked. How deeply profound.

Posting this video reminds me that I need to add a new label/category to some blog posts-- "stupid."



HT: Richard Hall

Wednesday, March 03, 2010

How Should We Discern the Call to Ordained Ministry?

Over the years I have had the great privilege of being a member of several different District Committees on Ordained Ministry as well as chairing a few. There are many things I like about the United Methodist process of discernment in the call to ministry, but I have also wondered if we haven't also hindered the call or in some cases even missed the call of others because our process is so Westernized and institutionalized.

I have said to some of my colleagues over the years that I doubt that Jesus or Paul or any other biblical character would be approved by any UM Board of Ordained Ministry, not because the members of these Boards are not spiritually discerning folks. I greatly admire many of my colleagues on the Board of Ordained Ministry. It's just my hunch that our process itself would question their readiness and even their fitness for ministry. Some may find that comment too harsh, but I have trouble seeing the parallels between the biblical call stories and how those calls are worked out, and our contemporary process for discerning that call. In the Bible when God calls, the one so commissioned immediately gets to work. When someone approaches us with a call to ministry, we immediately want them to complete a battery of tests and read books and fill out a manual.

When one considers the seismic shifts currently happening within so-called "mainline" Protestantism-- the decline in churches, the average increase in age of most congregations, the difficulty that most churches specifically and the denominations generally have in moving into the twenty-first century, while they unwittingly continue to structurally operate as if it is 1957-- it should also be pondered that perhaps a change in the ministry inquiry and discernment process is also required. We want to attract younger clergy to our denomination, but we believe that in the process that we must work to "institutionalize" them so they will be loyal United Methodists. In that process, I can't help but notice that more than a few quickly get fed up with the hoops and strings and drop out, while others don't even venture into the so-called "mainline" denominations in the first place. Like Jeremiah, they have fire in their belly and a burning in their bones, and they are not about to let an "institution" slowly extinguish the fire.

Am I suggesting that we should no longer require psychological testing? Of course not. Do I want us to take just anyone who "feels" God is calling her or him to ordained ministry? Not at all. But I do think we need to be open to, not only using the ministry discernment process to work through one's call to ministry, but we also must know when the process is an obstacle, and then be willing to move the strings and hoops out of the way, so that some dynamic "burning bush" commissions will be allowed to move forward without hindrance.

Having spent time in Cuba teaching Methodist pastors there, the Cuba Conference's approach to ministry is quite different. When a person sensing a call to ministry approaches a District Superintendent expressing such, she or he says, "Great! Go out and start a house church, and when you have ten members, come back and see me."

Is such an approach perfect? No... but there does seem to be something more biblical about it.

At least it appears to be more biblical than, "You think you are called to ordained ministry? Great! Here... take this test."

Monday, March 01, 2010

Prayer Is the Way We Let God Loose in the World

The title of this post comes from Edna McDonough. I read her definition of prayer years ago and have never forgotten it.

I believe in the power of prayer. Several years ago when I was in Cuba teaching Methodist pastors there, one evening I was part of a worship service at the local Methodist Church. Near the end of the service the pastor gave an invitation for anyone to come forward who desired healing. One woman came to the front who had been suffering from a fever for weeks. Doctors could not figure out what was wrong with her. The pastor asked me to come forward to lay hands on her and pray for here. What I experienced next was quite unexpected.

When I placed my hands, one on her back and the other on her shoulder, her skin was not just warm; it was almost scaulding hot. It was like trying to grasp onto a hot radiator. I could hardly keep from letting go. I knew that what I was sensing was more than the warmth of a fever. Something more was happening. I offered my prayer and moved my hands away, which were still hot. (The next day my hands were sore.)

A couple of days later as we were preparing to leave that town to go to Havana in order to go home, the women I had prayed for came to the house where I was staying. Her fever was gone and she said she felt better than she had in weeks.

Prayer is indeed the way we let God loose in the world. In telling this story I am not suggesting that Christians should have this kind of experience every time we pray, nor do I think God always answers our prayers in such miraculous ways. I have laid hands on and prayed for many people over the years and only once did I have that experience of extreme heat on my hands, even though I have witnessed other answered prayers that were indeed miraculous. Neither am I claiming that God always answers prayers in such dramatic ways. More often than not, God responds through the actions of people in the routine of the everyday. I am also not suggesting that God always answers our prayers in the way we desire. What I am trying to communicate in telling this story is that prayer is more than simply a psychological exercise that makes us feel better. I do agree that prayer can be an emotionally comforting experience, but when we pray we are not simply talking to ourselves; we are speaking to the God of the Universe who hurled the planets into their orbits and put the stars in their heavenly place, and who loves us wants to act in our midst.

I fear, however, that too often our prayers are half-hearted expressions that we have been trained to offer because that is simply what Christians do. We pray hoping that God will answer but not actually expecting God to answer. Of course, there are plenty of Christians who pray expecting God will respond, but there are just as many, if not more individuals, for whom prayer is not the powerful practice it should be because they doubt the power of prayer itself.

If you have not done so today, I encourage you to take a few moments at some point and talk to God in the same kind of way you would talk to the person across the dinner table, whom you know is listening and whom you also count on to respond. God does hear us when we pray. There are a great many needs in our world today. Let's talk to God and let him loose in our midst.

Opinion Central Poll 2010.6: Final Results