A Weblog Dedicated to the Discussion of the Christian Faith and 21st Century Life

A Weblog Dedicated to the Discussion of the Christian Faith and 21st Century Life

This blog is a place for the discussion of all things significant and not so important as well. If you read something you disagree with, don't get angry; post a comment and join the discussion.

Passionate and lively debate is encouraged in the context of civility. Comments that include name calling and profanity will be deleted.

Monday, August 31, 2009

Jesus and Paul: Global Perspectives

T & T Clark, an imprint of Continuum, has released a pre-publication announcement of a new book entitled Jesus and Paul: Global Perspectives in Honor of James D. G. Dunn for His 70th Birthday. Essays are all written by former students of Dunn. I am honored to be a contributor.

Its listed price is a whopping $140.00, though Amazon is selling it for close to $90.00-- still it is not exactly chump change.
.
It is scheduled to be published in December.

Sunday, August 30, 2009

What Does Love Require?

Today's audio sermon from Leviticus 19:1-4, 9-18

A Prayer for the First Sunday in Kingdomtide

Heavenly Father, I pray that I may live this day in your presence and please you more and more. Lord Jesus, I pray that this day I may take up my cross and follow you. Holy Spirit, I pray that this day you will fill me with yourself and cause your fruit to ripen in my life: love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control. Holy, blessed, and glorious Trinity, three persons in one God, have mercy upon me. Amen.



--John Stott

Saturday, August 29, 2009

Opinion Central Poll 2009.35: Final Results

The Methodist Blogs Weekly Roundup 2009.23.202

Submit your post to umweeklyroundup@yahoo.com by noon EST on Saturday to guarantee that your post is included.

The week in review in the Methoblogosphere!

Dave Nichols writes on evangelism.

Dale Tedder posts on book summary services.

Poetic thoughts on anxiety from J. Scott McKay.

Dave Faulkner has been thinking mostly about buildings.

Sacred sights and heartfelt yearnings from Dave Perry.

Sky McCracken reflects on ch-ch-ch-ch-changes.

Sally Coleman posts some thoughts on busyness and space.

Brian Russell offers the scriptural story briefly and missionally.

What did he say? Thoughts on John 6:56-69 from Michael Daniel.

Mark Winter joined the Heritage Celebration in Palmer, Texas.

"Dressed for Success"-- a sermon by Beth Quick.

Prayer groups according to Shane Raynor.

Ken Carter writes on summer reading.

Andy Bryan posts on Promotion Sunday for grown-ups.

Olive Morgan on the gospel outreach at the Reading Rock Festival

Andrew Stoddard posts reflections on 1 Kings 3:16-28, Acts 27:27-44, and Mark 14:12-26.

Reflections on forgotten books from Tony Mitchell.

Kim Matthews reflects on the amazing risk God has taken.

Greg Hazelrig posts his thoughts for the day on Luke 4:1-2.

Friend, can you spare some CHANGE? A question from Steve Heyduck.

Deb Spaulding cogitates on the fear factor.

Matt Kelley is frustrated with the current political climate.

The pastor in the cemetery is Questing Parson.

Dave Warnock has arrived at Greenbelt 2009.

Jeremy Smith shares comments on franchised churches and disenfranchised Christians.

Jim Parsons reflects on funerals for the unknown.

Some thoughts from Ken Hagler on being united by God's plan.

For John Meunier, it is God versus the logic professors.

Lorna Koskela is going about the Father's business.

"Choosing Life"-- a sermon by Robert Wyckoff.

Richard Heyduck asks, "How's your love life?"

Daniel Hixon writes on how God changes the brain.

Did God create Adam and Steve? Jay Voorhees reflects on the matter.

Joseph Yoo offers thoughts on Michael Vick, dog fighters and such.

Henry Neufeld warns us to beware of friends bearing manuscripts.

"This I Believe" according to Bill McAllily.

Angela Shier-Jones reminds us that ordination is for life and not death. Best of the Methoblogosphere!

Andrew Thompson offers tips for new bloggers.

Have UMs surrendered the legacy of entire sanctification? Read Kevin Watson. Best of the Methoblogosphere!

Chris Roberts states that Christians are Christians and Muslims are Muslims.

Dan Dick asks, "How deep the well?"

Friday, August 28, 2009

The Quotable C.S. Lewis #22: Goodness Is God's Work

"Even the best Christian that ever lived is not acting on his own stream-- he is only nourishing or protecting a life he could never have acquired by his own efforts. And that has practical consequences. As long as the natural life is in your body, it will do a lot towards repairing that body. Cut it, and up to a point it will heal, as a dead body would not. A live body is not one that never gets hurt, but one that can to some extent repair itself. In the same way a Christian is not a man who never goes wrong, but a man who is enabled to repent and pick himself up and begin over again after each stumble-- because the Christ-life is inside him, repairing him all the time, enabling him to repeat (in some degree) the kind of voluntary death which Christ Himself carried out."

"That is why the Christian is in a different position from other people who are trying to be good. They hope, by being good, to please God if there is one; or-- if they think there is not-- at least they hope to deserve approval from good men. But the Christian thinks any good he does comes from the Christ-life inside him. He does not think God will love us because we are good, but that God will make us good because He loves us; just as the roof of a greenhouse does not attract the sun because it is bright, but becomes bright because the sun shines on it."

--Mere Christianity

Wednesday, August 26, 2009

Senator Edward Kennedy (1932-2009)

Senator Edward Kennedy, the Liberal Lion of the Senate, has died. Those who have said that an era has ended with his death are right. While it is the case that there are plenty of Kennedys still around, their influence in politics will not be what it has been apart from the youngest of the nine Kennedy children.

Senator Kennedy was committed to the cause of liberalism and championed that cause, although as a master legislator he worked across the aisle in order to get something of what he wanted, while giving the opposition something of what they wanted in the democratic process. Kennedy would make an ideological speech declaring his convictions on the floor of the Senate and then behind the scenes embarked on a pragmatic course of legislation that is so foundational to democracy.

Kennedy was also a very gracious person. He never let partisan arguments get in the way of goodness and kindness. When former press secretary to George W. Bush, the late Tony Snow was suffering with cancer, Kennedy would call Snow regularly to inquire about his health. When a young Republican Senator was welcomed to Capitol Hill with insults from some Democratic Senators, Kennedy warmly welcomed him to his office and showed him around. This was not a "butter them up" game for the late Senator; he was truly an individual who cared about people. There are even some stories that have floated around Capitol Hill that when a constituent asked for help from the Senator, he would, when it was expedient, enlist the aid of a couple of Republican colleagues, backing away allowing them to take the credit for assisting someone in need.

In a day when partisanship means not even associating socially with members of the other party, Kennedy is a reminder to us that democracy works best when it operates passionately yet civilly, and that regardless of one's political views, the opponents are just as concerned about the welfare of the nation as those on your side. It cannot be overstated how much he was respected by his colleagues on both sides of the aisle. Usually one does not gain respect unless one first shows respect.

As always your comments of tribute are welcome, but the policy of this blog is that when obituaries are posted, criticism or back-handed shots at the recently deceased or even using someone's death to bash members of the opposition will be deleted.
.
+ + + + + + +
.
Cross-Posted at RedBlueChristian

Tuesday, August 25, 2009

Look at All the Wonderful Things We Get to Believe!

Over twenty years ago, when I was a graduate student at Duke Divinity School, I remember my thesis advisor, Stanley Hauerwas comparing the reductionism of liberal Protestantism to the robust account of Catholic dogmatic reflection. The former asked the question cynically, "How much of this stuff do I have to believe and still be a Christian?" The latter stated in a tone of wonder, "Look at all this stuff that we Christians get to believe!"

This is not a post on how Protestants should uncritically accept the Catholic belief in the immaculate conception of Mary. Critical thinking and reflections are necessary and should not be neglected. On the other hand, I have just read retired Episcopal Bishop John Spong's essay, "Easter: In Need of Reinterpretation." His unfortunately poor argument is the motivation for my comments. Spong is a smart and thoughtful man to be sure; but if he is right in his reductionist account of Christianity with no bodily raised Jesus, nor a God who does anything miraculous, we Christians ought to give it up and go home. Although he would reject my critique, it is clear to me that his God is a creator who has no power; his God is a redeemer who had no ability to do the unimaginable. His God works within the confines of a woefully limited human imagination. His God is bound to the powers of death, not the God who brings the unimaginable to those who refuse to believe what is only right before their eyes.

C.S. Lewis argued that one of the greatest obstacles to contemporary accounts of Christian theology was the lack of imagination, the lack of faith that God could do something new and unexpected. The bane of modern theology is reductionism, the belief in an impotent God who must conform to our understanding of the way the universe works, the way the world must operate. The problem with the good Bishop Spong's account of Christianity is not that it is unintelligent, but that it lacks imagination.... imagination that the God who created out of nothing can bring life, but is unwilling or unable to bring that very same life back from the dead. It lacks imagination to believe that God works above and beyond what we human beings think is impossible. Bishop Spong's problem is not that his God is too big, but rather that his deity is far too small. Spong has bound the God of the Universe in a box of his own belief and then pleads for us to believe in a God without much power to change the world.

Several years ago when I was in Cuba engaged in teaching mission, we were nearing the end of a worship service one evening. The pastor called individuals to come forward for healing. One woman came to the front of the sanctuary. She had been sick for over a month. The doctors did not know what was wrong with her, but she had a rather high fever. The pastor of the church called me forward and asked me if I would pray for her. I placed my hands on her shoulders. As I began to pray, the heat from her body got warmer on my hands. In the next few moments it got so hot, I could hardly keep my hands on her shoulders. It felt like I was trying to hold on to a radiator. I finished my prayer. My hands were warm and sore. She sat down in her seat in the sanctuary. A few days later as we were preparing to leave for home, one of the church members found me where we were staying. The woman I prayed for woke up that morning-- her fever was gone for the first time in a month. She felt better than she had in weeks.

What happened to her? I am not sure, but I know this. Bishop Spong has no idea how to explain this because his God is too small. He can chalk it up to the psyche of the human mind and its ability to influence the body, but there is no room in a reductionist theology for a truly miraculous act of God. My God is one who literally raises the dead and heals the dying. I cannot explain it, but I know it is true.

Monday, August 24, 2009

The Kingdom of God According to Graham Stanton and James D. G. Dunn

A great discussion on the Kingdom of God with the late Graham Stanton and my doktorvater, Jimmy Dunn.



Good stuff!

HT: Matthew Montonini

Opinion Central Poll 2009.34: Final Results

Offering Pastoral Care When Things are Out of Control

Many years ago when I was a young associate pastor, there was a parishioner who was all of 4 foot 3 inches tall. She was Italian (like me) and she was a pistol. A couple of her fellow parishioners referred to her as a "test," She often challenged them in their discipleship as she accused them of stealing things and committing other unsavory deeds. "Maria" (as I will call her) was quite a piece of work, but I liked her. She kept us on our toes.

Over time we began to notice that Maria was deteriorating mentally. One day we received her monthly contribution in an envelope sewn shut with needle and thread. Eventually, her only living relative, a nephew, had her committed to a nursing home because she clearly was unable to take care of herself.

I would visit Maria in the nursing home on regular occasions. When I would enter her room, there was only one thing on her mind. She wanted out! She would see me and say, "Allan, I am glad you are here. Bring your car around to the back and come get me. We will get some lunch and then you can take me home." As far as Maria was concerned it was a jail break and I was the one providing the wheels to get her out of town. At first I would tell her that was not the reason I was there. As far as she was concerned, it was the reason I was there, and I would not tell her otherwise. I would then try to change the subject, but she was singularly focused. I did my best to speak with her, but all she wanted was to get out of there and I represented her freedom. Finally, in frustration I would pray for her and then tell her I was getting the car... and then I would just leave. Every time I visited her after that, she would never remember that I had just left her, but she was always ready to get out of there and I was not going to dissuade her.

That was more than twenty years ago. Maria has been gone for a while now. I cannot say that I did everything I could have as her pastor. I still wonder if I could have done some things different. After over twenty-five years in ministry, there are times when I am not quite sure what to do in a difficult situation, but I know that I must do my best to embody the presence of Jesus Christ in each and every opportunity presented to me.

I also know this-- We the followers of Jesus are called to care for those in need even when the demands of ministry do not go the way we think they should. I had too many routine nursing home visits; Maria forced me out of the routine and made me think once again what it meant to be a presence to one whose thoughts were in a time and place where only God could enter.

After all these years, I still think of Maria and how, in her dementia, she kept me on my toes; and how she made me think long and hard of what it meant to do ministry in a context where I had no idea what is going to happen next. It is the surprises of ministry that teach us the most, if we are willing to be taught, and if we are willing to do ministry out of control.

Sunday, August 23, 2009

Let Someone Else Do It

Today's audio sermon from Exodus 3:1-15

A Prayer for the Twelfth Sunday after Pentecost

Almighty and ever-living God, Your Spirit made us your children, confident to call you Father. Increase your Spirit within us and bring us to our promised inheritance. Grant this through our Lord Jesus Christ, your Son, who lives and reigns with you and the Holy Spirit, one God for ever and ever. Amen.

Saturday, August 22, 2009

The Methodist Blogs Weekly Roundup 2009.22.201

Submit your post to umweeklyroundup@yahoo.com by noon EST on Saturday to guarantee that your post is included.

The week in review in the Methoblogosphere!

Gavin and Erin Richardson have a son! Congratulations to them and welcome to Brooks Foster Richardson!

Bishop Robert Schnase writes on the power of an enthusiastic invitation.

Dave Nichols reflects on biblical foundations.

What is our chief end? Andrew Thompson asks the question.

It took the church to make a feminist out of Angela Shier-Jones.

Bill McAlilly posts on the radical center.

Scott McKay offers a prayer for the new school year.

Dave Morris offers a Beginning Translation Guide for The Gospel of Invitation.

Some thoughts on love without involvement from Henry Neufeld.

Joseph Yoo reflects on his call to ministry.

We fail to trust ourselves according to Jay Voorhees.

Do men use abortion to manipulate women? Daniel Hixon ponders the question.

Richard Heyduck cogitates on designing a worship service for outsiders.

Robert Wyckoff on bread and wisdom.

Lorna Koskela wants to hear from you. What do you think of mission spirituality?

Dave Camphouse shares his perspective on God's call to ministry.

Brian Vinson reflects on discerning the call to ministry as well.

If hell was good enough for John Wesley... well... read John Meunier.

Ken Hagler is looking beyond the hunt.

Jim Parsons wonders if hell is empty.

Jeremy Smith ponders original sin and original grace. Best of the Methoblogosphere!

Some advice from Dave Warnock to complementarians.

Questing Parson wants to know whose grief we are grieving?

Matt Kelley reflects on discerning the call.

Who wastes more money? Charity? Business? the Federal Government? Read Gerry Charlotte Phelps.

Deb Spaulding is offering the gift of encouragement.

Does Jesus compare with duct tape? Steve Heyduck does not think so.

Greg Hazelrig posts his thought for the day on 1 John 4:1.

Kim Matthews writes on unity and compassion.

"What's Love Got To Do With It?"-- a sermon by Tony Mitchell.

Andrew Stoddard posts reflections on 2 Samuel 19:1-23, Acts 24:1-23, and Mark 12:28-34.

Richard Hall revisits the healthcare controversy in the United States.

Olive Morgan posts an update on the situation of the church in Fiji.

Thoughts on life metaphors from Andy Bryan. Best of the Methoblogosphere!

Ken Carter shares his initial impressions on United Methodism in Liberia.

Should Jim Wallis apologize for cursing Sarah Palin? Shane Raynor offers his thoughts on the question.

"Wise Up!"-- a sermon by Beth Quick.

Mark Winter has hit a home run in Clifton.

Death, says Michael Daniel, is a certain reality of life.

Brian Russell offers the top ten Bible passages with a missional twist.

Dale Tedder writes on pouring our lives into the lives of others.

On the need to live life more slowly from Rick Mang.

Sally Coleman shares reflections on letting go.

Sky McCracken rants-- let the politicians have "liberal" and "conservative"-- the church should ditch the notions.

John Battern is giving his congregation the opportunity to ask him questions in worship.

The Prophet Isaiah and Dave Perry ask, "Have you not known? Have you not heard?"

William Chaney wonders what Jesus would say about healthcare reform.

Steven Manskar invites us to join the John 10:10 challenge.

Are you offended by Jesus? Read Dave Faulkner.

The two places where Nathan Mattox can see himself worshipping.

Thursday, August 20, 2009

Brett Favre Meets St. Augustine-- As Time Goes By

Brett Favre has unretired for yet another time, signing with the Minnesota Vikings. He has been an incredible talent over the years and more than a few believe that he still has the stuff to continue as an effective quarterback. No one can get inside of Favre's head to know what his ultimate motives are for his indecisiveness in letting go of the game he loves. It could be just that-- he doesn't want to let go of the game he loves. It is also possible that Favre is hanging on to the past and fears moving into the future. We do not know if that is the case and I am not about to suggest for a moment that I am smart enough to know what he reflects upon in the silent moments of his life. But Favre's retirement, unretirement, retirement, unretirement saga has sparked some ponderments in me about the passing of time and life as it moves on so quickly, and where God is in the midst of it all.

I have always been fascinated by the concept of time. I remember when I was about sixteen years old or so, reading an article in Smithsonian Magazine about time. We really do not know how to define time. Einstein demonstrated that time is not a constant. If we could travel fast enough, the passage of time would slow down for those moving so quickly. Theologians have wrestled with understanding the concept of time-- the fifth century bishop and theologian, Augustine wrote on it and twentieth-century New Testament scholar, Oscar Cullmann made an attempt to understand it in relation to eternity. Whatever time is, we human beings are in it and we are apparently bound to it. God indeed transcends time, but we do not. What we seem to notice is not the movement of time (how does one notice that?), but the changes that take place over our lives-- the graying of the hair, the growing of our children, the arrival of grandchildren, the election of presidents, holidays celebrated... and then the next one a year later without someone who is no longer there "in time" to join the festivities.

I do not know what Brett Favre is facing in his private thoughts in reference to the truth that while he is still an incredible talent, there are other much younger quarterbacks out there who are a couple of steps faster, who have a little more stamina, and who are not as sore as he now is the day after a game. No doubt some of those "young turks" remind Favre of himself in younger days, but he cannot stave off the aging of his body, even though he may slow it down with regular exercise and a healthy diet. Neither can he avoid the fact that next year or the year after or even, perhaps, the year after that, he will no longer be able to play football... the game he loves. Time will have passed him by and he will be too old.

Yesterday, Carol and I went to the high school football field to watch our son, Jason perform in the marching band playing baritone. It didn't seem like too many years ago that Jason was quite young, toddling around the house and blowing loudly on a whistle in the house shattering our ear drums. Now he is out on the field playing beautifully and marching in step with the rhythm. Even though I am not sure what time is, I know that like my son on the football field, it marches on.

And I also know this-- the God who transcends time has chosen to enter our time for no other reason than in his love for us. In so doing, God has chosen to limit himself so that he can enjoy all the benefits of what it is like to be in relationship with his creation bound in time; so that he can rejoice in the wonderful surprises of our lives and so that he can also surround us in our unexpected sorrows. This is not some version of process theology which argues that God himself grows and changes and develops of over time, and that somehow God is intrinsically limited in his nature. Clearly not! Rather, my reading and study of the Bible over the years has convinced me that our relational God has chosen to be in genuine relationship with us, and that means nothing less than God's self-limiting in order for that relationship to be genuine in the passing of time. Of course, God remains sovereign, as if it were possible for him to relinquish that. How it is that God remains outside of time and yet gets into the mix of time and space is something I cannot begin to imagine nor explain; but the biblical writers seems to think that is what God has done.

And why should that thought surprise Christians? We believe that the supreme and ultimate divine invasion into our time and space has happened in Jesus Christ. To affirm that God has entered into time and space in a way that God may even willfully limit portions of God's knowledge is not a denial of the sovereignty of God; rather it highlights the sovereignty of our Lord who is in control and in charge, even though that same God chooses the limitations of time and space in order to be with us. St. Augustine writes, "God loves each and every one of us as if we are the only one to love." God cannot love us in this way without being right next to us in this time and in this space. The god of Deism is most unsatisfying.

We may not know what time is, but we need not fear it; for in all the times of our lives, God is with us. God is really and truly with us.

Thanks be to God!

Wednesday, August 19, 2009

Did Peter Abandon the Jewish Food Laws at Antioch? #4 (Final Post)


Food laws as prescribed in the Torah were an obvious mark of Jewish identity in the first century CE. The issue of table-fellowship in Galatians was not one of complete abandonment of all the laws regarding table-fellowship. It appears that the "men from James" wanted stricter adherence to the laws concerning food and ritual purity. As an increasing number of Gentiles entered the church, the more important became the issue of the identity of the people of God. Food laws figured into that identity.

The limits of table-fellowship were different from community to community. They were generally more relaxed in Hellenistic Judaism. Devout Jews, however, basically avoided table-fellowship with Gentiles. In demanding stricter devotion to the food and purity laws, the "men from James" were building a wall between Jewish Christians and Gentile Christians. Unless the Gentile believers Judaized there could be little or no table-fellowship between Jewish and Gentile Christians.

For Paul this was inconsistent with the gospel, for it denied the Gentiles full membership in the church. The covenant privileges remained in the hands of ethnic Israel. The Gentile Christians, even as believers, remained "sinners," which for Paul missed the point of justification by faith.

Monday, August 17, 2009

Sunday, August 16, 2009

Growing Up to See the Big Picture

Today's audio sermon from Genesis 50:15-21

A Prayer for the Eleventh Sunday after Pentecost

Father, may everything we do begin with your inspiration and continue with your saving help. Let our work always find its origin in you and through you reach completion. We ask this through our Lord Jesus Christ, your Son, who lives and reigns with you and the Holy Spirit, one God for ever and ever. Amen.

The Liturgy of the Hours

Saturday, August 15, 2009

Breyer and Scalia on Judicial Philosophy

In light of the recent confirmation of Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor, I decided to link to a dialogue between Justices Stephen Breyer and Antonin Scalia sponsored by The Federalist Society. It is a rather long but engaging discussion on differences in judicial philosophy.

Click on the picture

Friday, August 14, 2009

Truth is Stranger than Fiction 2009.19

Granny, 87, Kills Venomous Rattler With Bare Hands

By BRIAN HAMACHER
Updated 12:00 PM EDT, Tue, Aug 11, 2009

An 87-year-old Tampa woman had had it with the motherloving snakes on her motherloving porch.

So when a seven-inch pygmy rattlesnake slithered up to Esther Orring's door and bit her on the hand, she got even, strangling the venomous little serpent with her bare hands.

"She's a tough lady," Orring's daughter, Maria Pellicone, told WFLA. "She's a very strong person, so she will be a survivor."

Orring has been hospitalized since the Monday incident, after she was administered several vials of antivenin.

But the well-gripped granny is expected to make a full recovery, and Pellicone says she'll have the dead snake framed for her.

Thursday, August 13, 2009

The Inmates Are Running the Asylum

Ex-governor Sarah Palin talks about Obama death panels. Senator Harry Reid calls the town hall protesters "evil-mongers." Liberal pundit Ed Schultz says that most conservatives want President Obama shot. Conservative radio show talking head Rush Limbaugh says that President Obama is a racist.

Too many of our politicians and members of the national media on both sides of the political aisle have taken one too many drinks from the stupid well.

What It Means to Trust in God


Confusion and questions are often raised when we read or hear the story in Genesis 22. Abraham is commanded by God to sacrifice his son, Isaac. And while God relents in the end, many wonder why God would even command such a thing. To ask a father to willingly kill his own son seems so out of character with the God we have come to know in the pages of the Bible.

It was way back in Genesis chapter twelve that God originally called Abraham in his old age commanding him and his wife Sarah to head west to a land of God's choosing. In Abraham's obedience, God will make of him a great nation, even though he and Sarah are well past child-bearing years and have no children. God will fulfill that promise in the birth of their son Isaac. But it will be years in between God's call of Abraham and the birth of Isaac. In the meantime both Abraham and Sarah attempt to force the fulfillment of God's promise in several different ways, the most notable being Sarah giving her handmaiden, Hagar to Abraham so that he might have a son with her. He will and the child will be named Ishmael.

So while Abraham and Sarah have certainly shown their faithfulness, at times they have also demonstrated their faithlessness in dramatic ways. At times, Abraham does not trust God, but neither does God trust Abraham to be obedient when it counts. God's command to Abraham in chapter 22 is for the purpose of finding out if Abraham's faith can stand the difficult test.

As we listen to this story we shudder to think that anyone would dare sacrifice a child, but let us not forget that in our own world children's lives are being sacrificed slowly by a rampant sex slave trade. There are parents in other parts of the world who even as we speak are selling their young children into forced prostitution—so much for human progress.

Even though the command to sacrifice Isaac sounds difficult to our ears, it really did not for Abraham. Abraham lived in a world where child sacrifice was not unknown. Abraham had contact with people who practiced religions where children were sacrificed. The fact that the Old Testament condemns such a practice demonstrates that it was happening. There is no doubt that Abraham was greatly grieved at the thought of losing his son whom he loved, but the practice itself was not unknown to him.

Abraham's faith is anguished. Here we see that faith is serious business. Abraham not only has to trust God that God will fulfill his promise to make of Abraham a great nation, even though the one through whom the promise will be fulfilled (Isaac) will be killed. On several occasions Abraham and Sarah tried to take matters into their own hands and fulfill the promise themselves because they were too impatient to wait on God and perhaps didn’t even believe God would keep his word at certain times in their lives. Now Abraham has to trust that God will keep his promise even without Isaac, and continue to have faith even in the midst of indescribable grief as he mourns the death of his son.

Just as Abraham is about to do what God commands, God speaks and tells him to relent, "But the angel of the LORD called to him from heaven, and said, 'Abraham, Abraham!' And he said, 'Here I am.' He said, 'Do not lay your hand on the boy or do anything to him; for now I know that you fear God, since you have not withheld your son, your only son, from me.' And Abraham looked up and saw a ram, caught in a thicket by its horns. Abraham went and took the ram and offered it up as a burnt-offering instead of his son. So Abraham called that place 'The LORD will provide'; as it is said to this day, 'On the mount of the LORD it shall be provided' (22:11-14).

We like to think that we are in control of our lives, and of course we need to take responsibility for our lives and our futures. We should buy insurance, we should save for retirement, but there is so much that comes to us that is beyond our control. The depth of our faith is not revealed in how we shape our present, but how we live in the present as we respond in faith to those things that come our way over which we have no control. Abraham had no control over his situation, but he responded in faith even as he struggled and anguished. We too must trust in God. Faith is easy when life is good; faith is deepened when the circumstances of life leave us in a shambles.

When the tests of life come our way, God does not desire that we be miserable. Indeed, God hurts when we hurt. But what God desires of us when life tests our faith is that when we are forced outside of our comfort zones, we will learn that we have to trust in God in all things and in all times and in all places.

God wants to be able to say to each and every one of us, "Now I know that you trust me."

Wednesday, August 12, 2009

Opinion Central Poll 2009.32: Final Results

Some Further Thoughts on Town Hall Meetings, Protests, and Tone-Deaf Politicians

I do not like to keep posting on the same subject two days in a row. I like to mix it up, but yesterday Henry Neufeld linked to my post on town hall meetings, protests, and tone-deaf politicians. In expressing his thoughts Henry basically gets to the main point of what I was attempting to say. He writes, I have been repeatedly amazed by the extent to which both sides of many debates are completely oblivious to the ways in which they use one another’s arguments each time the roles are reversed.

He states further, ...I think a corollary to this, is that politicians and voters in general really love an ad hominem approach to the political debate. We believe what people say if they’re on our side. We smear groups with the actions of some. The tea party protesters are smeared because some participants cross a line, as they did in Jacksonville, but ACORN is smeared because some people that they hire cut corners and engage in fraud.... My suggestion here is that a debate that so constantly turns to an ad hominem approach can hardly be expected to produce rational results. That’s the trouble with our alternatives. I would gladly vote the Democrats out of office, but then the Republicans would take over. I would gladly vote the Republicans out of office, but then the Democrats would (and have) taken over.

I concur. It seems as if each side imposes a certain ethical standard on the other, but refuses to apply that same standard to their own. The culture of corruption only refers to the other party; only the other side politicizes (whatever that means) an event; only the other side practices the politics of fear; and only the other side tells lies and misrepresents the facts. It is this context of demagoguery and finger pointing that will not, as Henry notes, "produce rational results."

The larger concern for myself as a Christian is that we disciples draw up lines along the same polarizing positions and accuse each other of the same thing. That brings back to my mind what I have stated before on this blog-- we Christians in the West have lost the primary role of the church as that which practices the politics of witness, and instead have substituted the politics of serving in Caesar's court. Both left and right have fallen into the latter trap. Indeed, if it were not for our Constantinian leanings the church would not even know the politics of left and right. Such a distinction would be nonsensical.

Whether Henry would agree with everything I just said, I do not know, but thanks to him for succinctly getting to the heart of the problem we face in political debate in our country.

+ + + + + + +

Cross-Posted at RedBlueChristian

Tuesday, August 11, 2009

Town Hall Meetings, Protests, and Tone-Deaf Politicians

Like many others I have been watching the news and reading it on the Internet attempting to get serious information on what has been happening on the health care debate out there in cities and towns across the country. What I have been watching is a reminder to me of why I have been disillusioned with both political parties for some time, and why I have declared myself an Independent for over a decade. So I offer some thoughts which will irritate partisans on the Left and on the Right, which is OK; when it comes to politics I am an equal opportunity annoyer.

Point One: Town Hall Meetings-- It should be clarified right from the outset that town hall meetings are not really what their sponsors claim them to be; they are in reality nothing more than one-sided pep rallies meant to sell a product-- in this case someone's political agenda. President Obama trucks in a sympathetic crowd for his rah-rah sessions on health care as did George W. Bush for the War in Iraq before him. In so doing they have turned what could have been a meaningful exchange of ideas into an infomercial long on generalities and short of specifics. If you want to watch an interesting town hall meeting, just watch an old rerun of The Bob Newhart Show. At least those Vermont gatherings had the virtue of being quite funny instead of a cure for insomnia. I think we should declare a moratorium on town hall meetings. They are as scripted and choreographed as presidential debates.

Point Two: Protesters-- I need to say that I am not much of a protester myself. I could never see the sense in standing outside somewhere with a picket sign. That does not mean I do not feel deeply about many issues as does everyone else, but I am a results kinda guy, and I have never been able to justify the cost of time to concluding benefits ratio when it comes to protesting. Nevertheless, I am glad to be in a society where people can exercise that form of free speech. We must never silence those who believe differently; and I support everyone's right to have at it. But what I have witnessed the past few days in reference to dissent reveals the hypocrisy of both the Left and the Right (why am I not surprised).

Sub-Point One Under Point Two: (The Right)-- Frankly, conservatives are not very good at protesting because they have not had much practice. In general conservatives do not protest, except for pro-life groups. So, when conservatives protest it looks... well... dumb. Don't get me wrong-- I support their right to dissent; but watching how they go about it tells me that they need a lot of coaching, which is why it is rather comical to hear some suggest that this is all orchestrated under Dick Armey. As Al Hunt of Bloomberg (who is no conservative) said yesterday morning in an interview-- Dick Armey couldn't even organize Congress when he was in office. Of course, there has been some organization going on, but as Hunt also rightly noted, you can't organize this many people to come out all over the country. Many of them are there because they are truly upset and they are frustrated.

The other thing I will mention about conservatives is the utter hypocrisy they are now showing in their disdain for those who protested the War in Iraq suggesting that such protests were unpatriotic and not supportive of the troops. Now that they are on the minority end protest, which is about all they have, doesn't look so bad.

One more thing-- leave the protesting and shouting to outside of the town hall. Leave inside for the discussion and debate. Disrupting and stifling debate is not what democracy is about. Carry your signs on the sidewalk, but check them at the door. And critique the plan you oppose honestly and fairly. Stop the nonsense about the "bureaucratic death boards."

Sub-Point Two Under Point Two: (The Left)-- Unlike the Right, the Left has perfected protesting. Almost all of the protests that take place in this country are carried out by liberals. Unlike the Right, whose protests look as awkward as two teenagers on a first date, the Left has turned public demonstration and disruption of meetings into an art form by protesting everything from changing the name of fish to "sea-kittens" to blocking a guy with a chain saw from cutting down some tree infested with a rare multi-legged insect whose only purpose in creation is to mate once during a life-span of twenty-four hours. So it is really disingenuous now for those who have mastered the discipline of public dissent to act as if the very foundations of democracy are at stake because people on the Right are dissenting themselves on the Democrats' current health care proposal. Indeed, how dare Nancy Pelosi and Steny Hoyer write in an op-ed in USA Today that such disruptions are un-american; they who took such loud and public issue with Dick Cheney who said that dissent on Iraq was also un-american; and kudos to President Obama for repudiating such a comment in Mexico yesterday.

Which brings me to the White House-- The Obama Administration, (ala Robert Gibbs) displayed political cynicism in its worst form when it first suggested that the protests at town hall meetings were manufactured. Such a comment simply tried to hide the fact that there were people on the Right organizing a community of people for a cause. As I recall, Gibb's boss was at one time a community organizer. Indeed, the Constitution gives all American citizens the right to organize and assemble. Somebody in the White House should have thought twice before throwing that one out there.

And one more comment to the Left-- critique the opposition honestly and fairly. Stop the nonsense about protesters simply being extremists who can't accept the fact that we have an African-American president. Playing the "race card" will not further the discussion and debate.

Point Three: Tone-Deaf Politicians: Those who talk of the Washington bubble speak the truth. One of the biggest problems with Congress is the career-politician on the Left and on the Right. I used to oppose term limits for senators and representatives, but now I support them. What happens with career politicians is that they forget that they answer to the people, which is why they are so shocked at the dissension at town hall meetings. Members of Congress are used to simply informing their constituents of all the wonderful things they are doing for them. Town hall meetings have become nothing more than progress reports with a few friendly, softball questions. They truly do not know how to respond to voters who have had it with vague generalities and the "just trust us" mentality.

When the Republicans controlled the White House and Congress they over-reached in a big way. They mistook their control of both elected branches of government as a mandate from the people to do what they willed and spend what they desired. They were tone-deaf to what the people wanted and the voters tossed them out of office and gave power to the Democrats. The Democrats, however, have so quickly forgotten the lesson they should have learned from the other party. They now are acting like they have some mandate to do what they will and spend what they desire. Nancy Pelosi has apparently forgotten as well that her party gained control of Congress because of the election of moderate Democrats. The "blue dogs" made her Speaker of the House. She better not put them in the dog house with their constituents or she will end up out of the House after November 2010.

I am not a guy who likes screaming and yelling to make a point. I would much rather sit a bunch of people down at a table over coffee and have a spirited yet civil debate over health care or any other matter than concerns all of us. But it seems that there are only two ways that the American people can get the attention of politicians from both parties-- in an election year they vote, in a non-election year they have to resort to screaming and yelling to be heard.

After all, if your elected official is tone-deaf, that is about all you can do.

+ + + + + + +

Cross-Posted at RedBlueChristian

Monday, August 10, 2009

Did Peter Abandon the Jewish Food Laws at Antioch? #3


Paul rejected his Jewish Christian brothers' insistence that Gentiles still needed to take up the yoke of the law, even though they believed in Jesus Christ. In Paul's view such an attitude continued to place the Gentile believers in the category of "sinners." The phrase "Gentile sinners" may very well been employed by the "men from James" as a reference to the Gentile believers. The term would raise questions in the minds of those Jews having table-fellowship with the Gentiles. Should they eat with sinners, that is Gentiles who do not possess the law (Psalms 27:3; 54:3; 91:7; 124:3; 128:3; Tobit 13:8; Jubilees 23:23-24; 4 Ezra 4:23), or more importantly, who do not follow the halakic rules?

The very concept of "sinner" in reference to the Gentile Christians meant for Paul that his Jewish brothers had missed the point of justification by faith. His argument in 2:15-18 and beyond is that in Christ God has justified the Gentiles through faith, even though they remain Gentiles. They remain Gentiles, but in Christ they are no longer "sinners." Justification by faith is not simply the way one enters the covenant, it is the way one lives in the covenant. Therefore, circumcision and table-regulations were not to be required of the Gentiles. The inheritance of Abraham now belonged to the Gentiles as well (3:14).

Sunday, August 09, 2009

How NOT to Win Friends and Influence People

Today's audio sermon from Genesis 37:1-11

A Prayer for the Tenth Sunday after Pentecost

All-powerful and ever-living God splendor of true light, and never-ending day let the radiance of your coming banish from our minds the darkness of sin. We ask this through our Lord Jesus Christ, your Son, who lives and reigns with you and the Holy Spirit, one God for ever and ever. Amen.

The Liturgy of the Hours

Saturday, August 08, 2009

The Methodist Blogs Weekly Roundup 2009.21.200

Submit your post to umweeklyroundup@yahoo.com by noon EST on Saturday to guarantee that your post is included.

*Rules for Inclusion

Special Note: This 200th edition of the MBWR is dedicated to John the Former Methodist, now John of the Zeray Gazette, who was the original keeper of the Weekly Roundup.

Also... there will be no MBWR next weekend. I will be teaching my last colloquium in theology for the summer. The Weekly Roundup will return the following weekend.

Now.... the week in review in the Methoblogosphere!

In reference to the Bible, is it all true? Read David E. Nichols.

Andrew Thompson asks, "What's in a mission statement?"

Is the American healthcare system broken? Wayne Cook offers some personal thoughts.

Brian Russell on why the Fall matters missionally. Best of the Methoblogosphere!

Joseph Slife is celebrating the first anniversary of Methodist Thinker.

A list of readings from Kevin Watson on United Methodist history.

Michael Daniel ponders bacon bits and Congress.

Mark Winter is experiencing VBS thrills.

"Changing Directions"-- a sermon by Beth Quick.

Shane Raynor cogitates on the five things needed for self-control. Best of the Methoblogosphere!

Ken Carter says, "Yes, it's August."

Does love equal stuff? Read Andy Bryan.

Olive Morgan reports on the atrocities in Pakistan.

Richard Hall asks us to pray for Pakistan.

Andrew Stoddard posts reflections on 2 Samuel 11:1-27, Acts 19:11-20, and Mark 9:2-13.

Tony Mitchell asks, "Is there a good day to die?"

An example in faith from Kim Matthews.

Greg Hazelrig posts his thought for the day on 1 Peter 2:4-10.

The joy of youth according to Steve Heyduck.

Deb Spaulding reflects upon the believer's prayer and Acts 4:24-25.

Members of Congress may have not read the current proposal on health care, but Gerry Charlotte Phelps has.

Matt Kelley mixes up some contemplative concrete.

It is a perfect day for Questing Parson.

Dave Warnock pauses for breath.

Chris Roberts reflects on the idea that the General Conference is out-of-touch with the UMC.

Jeremy Smith writes on the press and the UM amendments debacle.

Jim Parsons says, "No one likes me."

Some thoughts on facing the lion from Ken Hagler.

What if the church...? A what if from John Meunier.

Dave Camphouse shares his perspective on passion and pride.

Abi Carlisle-wilke comments on VBS with Kindergartners.

It's a non-fasting Friday for Lorna Koskela.

Are you growing up in Christ? Read Robert Wyckoff.

Richard Heyduck is a perfectionist... well... sort of.

Daniel Hixon wonders if Christianity is making a comeback in Europe.

Jay Voorhees offers a eulogy for a friend.

Are many church leaders cowardly lions? Joseph Yoo ponders the question.

Henry Neufeld wonders if it is pride or humility when we say it was all God.

Greg Morris is feasting at the Care Center Communion.

Scott McKay offers words of wisdom in poetic fashion.

Friday, August 07, 2009

Truth is Stranger than Fiction 2009.18

Cypriots seeking love potions wear away saints' tomb

Fri Aug 7, 2009
3:19pm EDT

NICOSIA (Reuters) - Unhappy lovers in Cyprus have been taking so much stone from the tomb of Saint Agapitikos to use in love potions that soon there won't be anything left.

Dust from the grave in the courtyard of the church in the village of Arodes in Paphos district has been used for centuries by the lovelorn, who are supposed to slip it into the drink of their objet d'amour.

But in recent years so many have been filching shards of stone that a quarter of the tomb has disappeared.

Mayor of Arodes Matthaios Stefanou is unclear whether Cypriots' love lives are becoming more troubled.

"A lot of people have said it works," he said. "In the last few years I don't know what's come over people, but they are flocking to the tomb for the stuff."

"Just the other day locals saw some people visiting the tomb, and they were there for a very long time, in the end they walked off with a huge chunk of stone, maybe even half a kilo of it!"

The island's antiquities department has been called in to help. "The only thing we can do is examine the damage and try to prevent any further damage," said Maria Hadjicosti, the acting director. Saint Agapitikos -- whose name means "lover"-- is believed to have served in the German army of the Crusaders before settling as a hermit in the area.

"You're very welcome to come and see the tomb, but please don't go taking any of it with you now," Stefanou said.

Tuesday, August 04, 2009

On Insulation and Confirmation in Politics

It is not a surprise that most political conservatives prefer to watch FOX News; neither is it difficult to believe that most political liberals rate MSNBC as their favorite cable news outlet. Both networks like to present themselves as unbiased. FOX News says that it is fair and balanced, but only political conservatives seem to think so. MSNBC states that it is the place for politics, when in reality it is the place only for liberal politics, which many honest liberals will admit. The fact that conservatives prefer one network while liberals like another sufficiently demonstrates that neither network should be seriously considered as a news outlet. Yes, there are serious journalists that work for both networks, but the evening lineup of each station does not represent the best in journalism, nor should it be considered as serious journalism.

I have no objection to political punditry. If Bill O'Reilly and Keith Olbermann want to wax political, they are free to do so; but O'Reilly needs to stop saying he is in the no spin zone when he is spinning all the time, and Keith Olbermann should refrain from putting on his Edgar R. Murrow voice and acting like a serious and fair journalist after he just had an emotional meltdown levelling an irrational piece of political demogoguery at his enemies in the previous segment. And it is not sufficiently convincing for FOX to badger its few token liberals and MSNBC to hound its very few token conservatives as a way of trying to be "unbiased."

But the fact that segments of the national media have become a disgrace is not the biggest problem we face in the political discourse of our country. Journalists have always lived in the illusion that they are fair, existing in a so-called no spin zone even while they feel a shiver running up and down their leg at the speech of a politician they adore. The most disconcerting issue is the lack of political discourse between common citizens who disagree with one another. Too many prefer insulating themselves from opposing views because they only want to be confirmed in what they already believe. So conservatives watch FOX and liberals watch MSNBC and they go to bed each night secure in the belief that they are right and the other side is wrong. Of course, if one actually wanted to get an honest and fair viewpoint from the other side, the evening lineup of both networks would not be the ones to watch anyway. What Republican wants to watch MSNBC make conservatives out to be stupid; and what Democrat desires to see the FOX evening lineup bash liberals?

The other night I happened upon a round table discussion on health care. I do not remember the network, but it was not one of the two in question here. A dozen or so people were seated around the table, some conservative, others liberal, some supporting President Obama's health care plan and others opposing it. What struck me about the conversation was that, unlike Bill O. and Keith O. the discourse generated much more light than heat. It was a thought-provoking discussion and everyone was positively contributing to the debate. There was no name calling-- no one was labeled a "pinhead" or "the worst person in the world." It was the kind of discussion that Nancy Pelosi, John Boehner, Harry Reid, Mitch McConnell, and President Obama should be engaged in instead of labeling only one player or another in the complex health care situation as "villains."

When we insulate ourselves from other serious points of view only for the purpose of being confirmed in what we already believe, we cannot say that we have seriously considered the issues before us. It is only in exposing ourselves to other points of view with a willingness to have our perspectives challenged, that we can be serious intellectual players in the important matters before us. Those who only watch the FOX evening lineup of shows and those who only watch the prime time cast on MSNBC are not serious thinkers.

For those who want substantive dialogue, discussion, and debate from both sides, O'Reilly and Olbermann, Hannity and Maddow are not serious options.

+ + + + + + +

Cross-Posted at RedBlueChristian

Sunday, August 02, 2009

A Prayer for the Ninth Sunday after Pentecost

Almighty and ever-living God, Your Spirit made us your children, confident to call you Father. Increase your Spirit within us and bring us to our promised inheritance. Grant this through our Lord Jesus Christ, your Son, who lives and reigns with you and the Holy Spirit, one God for ever and ever. Amen.

Saturday, August 01, 2009

The Methodist Blogs Weekly Roundup 2009.20.199

Submit your post to umweeklyroundup@yahoo.com by noon EST on Saturday to guarantee that your post is included.

*Rules for Inclusion

The week in review in the Methobogosphere!

Bishop Robert Schnase posts on impulses to wordless prayer.

Is the recent arrest of a Harvard Professor a teachable moment? Bishop Sally Dyck asks the question.
.
Andrew Thompson is reconceiving youth ministry.
.
Daniel Hixon reflects on Bishop Whitaker's thoughts on praying with the church.
.
Richard Heyduck offers some initial thoughts on Dave Browning's book, Deliberate Simplicity: How the Church Does More By Doing Less.
.
Integrity still counts, writes John Montgomery.
.
Dale Tedder preaches on Grace that Sanctifies: Becoming Like Jesus.
.
Wayne Cook has a question for the General Conference.
.
Grace is what you get when you didn't get what you wanted-- Reflections from Will Grady. Best of the Methoblogosphere!
.
Robert Wyckoff asks, "Do you believe in magic?"
.
Jeremy Smith reflects on the possibility of two track Methodism-- doctrinal and missional.
.
Betty Newman writes on the Holsten Annual Conference and McKay's used books.
.
Lorna Koskela is fasting on Fridays from the Internet.
.
Some thoughts from Abi Carlisle-wilke on Jimmy Carter's resignation from the Southern Baptist Convention.
.
The poverty of God according to Stephen Taylor.
.
Rick Mang reflects on knowing the one thing in life. Best of the Methoblogosphere!
.
Dave Camphouse ponders worship and home repairs.
.
Our spiritual heritage: gods, goddesses and a romano-british altar-- A post from David Perry.
.
John Meunier cogitates on worship as a means of grace.
.
Ken Hagler reflects on life up close... or do your laundry.
.
Jim Parsons writes on parking spaces and church attendance.
.
What is the source of "news." Chris Roberts shares some thoughts.
.
Dave Warnock counsels us to have no fear.
.
Despite what some are now saying, David Hallam is still going for organic.
.
Richard Hall also insists that organic food is good for us.
.
Questing Parson wonders where they have all gone.
.
Matt Kelley comments on conspiracy theories and the media.
.
Following Jesus... Really?... Gerry Charlotte Phelps posts some reflections.
.
Deb Spaulding writes on the greatest name of all.
.
Steve Heyduck has had his pacifism tested.
.
Greg Hazelrig posts his thought for the day on Luke 17:17-18.
.
Reflections from Kim Matthews on chiming in the office and our relationship with God.
.
How do you grow a garden? Read Tony Mitchell.
.
Andrew Stoddard comments on the current conflict following the 2009 Mississippi Annual Conference.
.
Dave Faulkner preaches on Moses and the feeding of the five thousand.
.
Olive Morgan asks us to pray for Christians in Fiji.
.
Consumerism, accumulation, family and the need for time according to Sally Coleman.
.
Andy Bryan discusses First Corinthians 13 and weddings.
.
Ken Carter asks, "How can we sing the Lord's song in a strange land?"
.
Shane Raynor has a tool kit for radical Methodists.
.
They're mine!-- Insists Beth Quick.
.
Mark Winter is doubling the fun!
.
Sky McCracken writes on stuff that ought to matter.
.
Michael Daniel ponders when rhetoric no longer works.
.
Reflections from Kevin Watson on strong convictions of sin that earnestly inquire after a Savior.
.
Joseph Slife reports on the UMNS revised amendments story.
.
Brian Russell comments on reading Scripture from the Margins.