
Anyone who has read Dawkins knows that, while he raises some issues that deserve an answer from Christians, he is also quite unfair in his caricature of Christianity. He is also extremely insulting throughout the book, making it very clear that anyone who embraces religion is not very intelligent.
As we have been making our way through his book, we are attempting to do what Dawkins has not. We are trying to give him a fair hearing and refrain from insulting him personally (not that he would care). From a Christian standpoint this is quite necessary.
Whether it comes to disagreements over religion, politics, or anything else for that matter, it is important that we are fair to those with whom we disagree. It is all too easy to set up straw man arguments and go after someone's reputation, or simply insult the other person's intelligence. In so doing, we really don't have to deal with the substance of their views; we can simply write them off as stupid or crazy or the product of an abusive environment. We also get to ignore the complexity of faith and life by simplistically critiquing one's views as simplistic.
It is impossible to know where and why we disagree with someone else until we know what that persons believes. We cannot do that without a fair hearing. We cannot offer a substantive critique if we fail to deal with the substance of the argument, and instead go after the content of someone's character and intelligence.
Such a posture is out of character for those who follow Jesus, and I would have thought it was inconsistent with someone who teaches at the prestigious Oxford University.
2 comments:
I hope you can be persuaded into posting your class handouts or starting a new blog series on Dawkins. It would be very helpful to many of us thinking through these issues.
Jonathan:
I will consider it. Thanks for the suggestion.
Post a Comment